I'm seeing authentication (202) errors on reports sent to: discovery.spamnet.com
joy.cloudmark.com accepts my report fine.
Is there a mirroring problem? Or is there a fault with my installation (which
has not changed a jot in a couple of months [I'm still on 2.72].
=R=
--
> I would have to attribute the fact that it now runs unmodified on
> FreeBSD to changes made elsewhere in the source code, but that is
> largely conjecture. Is it possible that at this point only Linux is
> affected?
Whether or not the segfault happens, the code was faulty. It was trampling a
b
The following patch should clear up this segfault problem. I've verified it
with my install.
It's strange, but 2.72 razor-agents seem to have incorporated the FreeBSD
ports "patch", however this one they screwed up. The code as provided will
trample a byte beyond the allocated string... Since W
$ razor-check -v
Razor Agents 2.72, protocol version 3
$ uname -a
Linux 2.4.21 #1 Fri Jul 11 18:23:15 PDT 2003 i686 unknown
(Derived from Slackware 9.0)
$ perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.0 built for i386-linux
$ razor-check email.txt
Segmentation fault
CHECK - crashorama.
=R=
> I've put up a release candidate for 2.61 at
> http://razor.sourceforge.net/beta/razor-agents-2.61-beta.tar.gz
>
> If some of you would try it out and confirm it works, I'll
> do a real release.
I have an existing high-volume SA-2.63 + Razor installation... am I correct
in assuming that I can
> No news is good news.
This is the UNIX Way(tm).
Commands which don't return output are assumed to have completed
successfully. Whether it actually did what you wanted is a debate better
reserved for Philosophy and Human-Machine interaction studies.
=R=
-
> I currently use a simple .procmailrc to call spamassassin (im not using
> spamd) - do I need spamd to integrate razor?
No, you don't need it to integrate razor.
It's vital for any kind of busy server, however. The startup time of
PERL/SA is non-trivial.
=R=
> 0.6 HTML_WEB_BUGS BODY: Image tag intended to identify you
> 1.3 NO_OBLIGATION BODY: There is no obligation
>
> Is this done through a procmail filter, SA, or razor?
This isn't a Razor question. Try a Spamassassin list.
procmail-invoked SpamAssassin can't do "rejects" - as
> ./razor-report -f /home/sites/www.pdcweb.net/spam.mbx
>
> But I get no feedback confirming that anything happened - is this the
> correct behavior?
If it's feedback you crave, then add a -d switch.
The default behaviour is no feedback == no error.
=R=
--
> But its ALREADY been flagged as spam by spamassassin. So what's
> the point?
For you acting alone, there IS no point. But for the group of people using
Razor, there is very much a good point in reporting it. Like with any such
mass-reporting system, it's only as effective overall as the numb
Quoting Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> razor-report $F && rm $F
>
> so that all my quarentined email would be reported and then deleted.
> Unfortunately, the server timeout doesn't stop the '&& rm $F' from
> happening. I was hoping it would.
You may want to use the -f flag, since razor-rep
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected
> attachment(s).
Needless to say, there is no user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on my
system.
This spammer is crawling through posting-hostnames and attaching their own
usernames.
=R=
-
> copy of SA nailed the heck outa it too
Speaking of which, SA 2.61 is released. Tag and bag those spam-scum.
=R=
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for
> Of course I do not have port 2703 open to the server so this is not
> working. Is there a reason why this would have suddenly stopped working?
You don't need an INBOUND port open on 2703, you just need to allow OUTGOING
connections TO port 2703. In iptables-speak, you just need to:
iptables -
Yes...
The unix symlink is the Universal Band-Aid against "fascist" software.
It can be both your friend and your enemy. Use it wisely, Padawan.
=R=
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help yo
> Umm.. .razor isn't supposed to be a file.. it's supposed to be a
> *directory*.
>
> you should have /home/spamd/.razor/razor-agent.conf as your configfile.
This reminds me of a pet peeve with razor. CONTRARY to documentation, it
does NOT look in /etc/razor if no ~/.razor directory exists, it
I don't know, but here are the current contents of my Razor server lists...
# cat servers.catalogue.lst
rancor.cloudmark.com
stress.cloudmark.com
truth.cloudmark.com
# cat servers.discovery.lst
66.151.150.11
# cat servers.nomination.lst
joy.cloudmark.com
folly.cloudmark.com
Make sure your fi
> After
> watching over a week's worth of spam headers for the SA X-Spam headers I
> have not seen any Razor tests performed in a long time. How can I tell
The last razor-tagged email I've seen occurred on: Monday 03 Nov 2003 21:00 GMT
And I just testing razor-report -d and it accepted a spam r
> I'm not using SA in daemon mode.
That's fine.
> Is there some order to install SA and Razor, so that SA will work with
> Razor?
You should install Razor first, just to be sure that SA "finds it" during
the "build process" of SA.
Razor needs its own collection of prerequisite PODs and whatn
> So in theory, it shouldn't be necessary to upgrade Perl.
Bloody annoying. One thing I notice too is that within /usr/lib/perl5 there
is a site_perl directory and an i386-blah-blah directory.
These two directories have different versions of components! For example,
my site_perl sub-directory
I've successfully deployed numerous SA+Razor2's on "modern" Perl 5.8.x
systems, but when I turned to a friend's system who is still running 5.6, I
am encountering strange problems with Razor 2.
You will note that my installation procedure is identical for all of the
systems, with the exception of
Just testing to see if anyone reads this list.
I am a fairly new Razor user, and have some questions regarding some "best
practices" of operation issues.
1) Do I need to make special precautions against multiple reporting of the
same spam? I am thinking of setting up user-submitted robo-reportin
22 matches
Mail list logo
