A few times recently, I have gotten a biff notification in my terminal
window which contained the start of the razor perl script instead of
the start of an email message.
I'm a little concerned that this represents a malfunction in razor,
and that the biff message with the razor script indicates a
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 05:05:03PM -0500, D'Alessandro, Arthur wrote:
> I was getting long delays and contention on the lock files when running
> spamd with the '-D' option... Once that was removed, the machine's been
> perforating without a hitch.
>
> -Arthur D'Alessandro
I am running spamd with
> From: Christian Stigen Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Razor-users] Extreme load with razor2 and spamassassin
>
[...]
> Things worked fine, but the introduction of Razor on our mailserver seemed to
> impose quite a noticeable load to the system.
I have encountered
It cotinues to amaze me that an EFF employee can be som completely
ignorant of the distinction between the authors of the software, the
code itself, and how that code is used by the public. Is this NOT the
very distinction that the EFF is trying to pound into the heads of
Congressmen so that media
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 13:52:20 -0500
> From: "Rose, Bobby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The high trust score for a period of time won't do much in regards to
> those corp entities that have purchased their own Razor server and thus
> have their own database and configuratio
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:02:25 -0500
> From: Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Turning Razor into a censorship tool
>
> Razor does not list it as spam. You have a problem understanding what
> Razor is. Razor lists the OPINION of a Razor memb
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Re: Too many false positives...goodbye, razor
...
> As far as *never* being reported.. surely you must be joking.. I'm sure
> At 11:20 PM 2/15/2003 -0600, David Dellanave wrote:
> >I'm curious, why wou
After many months of using razor, it has become apparent to me that
there are too many irresponsible users, or that razor is doing an
inadequate job of compensating for them. I'm seeing far too many
false positives, including Merriam-Webster's "Word of the Day", eBay
outbid notification, and E*TRA
Every day or two, I get a message from Ethan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with the subject Tired of Working For Someone Else?
Razor *used to* catch this one every time. Then about a week ago, it
started passing it through. I did a razor-check -d, and that says
that the signature isn't even in the databas
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:08:39 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Ed Hennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Re: Razor-users digest, Vol 1 #404 - 13 msgs
>
> But what if, hypothetically, my filters are never wrong? Hypothetically,
> I've saved you the need
> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:04:14 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Ed Hennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Razor-users] False positives / opt-in lists on Razor
> But what's more, I _review_ every single piece that's reported (after the
> fact) to make sure it's spam, usually withi
> From: "Bill Sobel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:06:54 -0700
> Subject: [Razor-users] Whats with all the mailing lists being submitted to Razor?
>
> I've started to notice more and more legitimate opt in mailing lists are
> being wrongly submitted to R
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:11:16PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> Just don't auto-report, full stop. That feature's been gone from
> SpamAssassin for a while, and for a good reason.
I only installed SpamAssassin recently, and didn't know that it had
ever had the facility to auto-report. However, u
13 matches
Mail list logo
