cd .At 01:45 PM 1/26/2005, Jordan Ritter wrote:
However, the scheme has additional constriants
(besides trust metrics) that are designed to decrease the chances of
false positives which must be satisfied before the catalog servers
will acknowledge them. This likely explains why it looks to you as
At 01:45 PM 1/26/2005, Jordan Ritter wrote:
Despite your observations, it is not true that whiplashes are binary;
they are managed the same way inside the trust system as any other
signature scheme. However, the scheme has additional constriants
(besides trust metrics) that are designed to decreas
At 12:35 AM 1/26/2005, Rod Gasson wrote:
> From: "Eneko Lacunza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So this means that spammers can easily blacklist any domain they wish...
> :) Quite curious. It seems I can't do anything about this, really.
Clearly you misunderstand what Razor is and how it works.
Agreed he ha
From: "Eneko Lacunza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So this means that spammers can easily blacklist any domain they wish...
:) Quite curious. It seems I can't do anything about this, really.
Clearly you misunderstand what Razor is and how it works. For starters,
razor works with individual messages, not
At 11:55 AM 1/25/2005, Eneko Lacunza wrote:
From the report I received, it seems that Razor gave a cf=100 (100%?)
on my original message. Maybe that is too much weight for Whiplash
signature scheme, but I do not know well the Razor system and surely I'm
wrong.
Yeah, whiplash seems to be an
Hi,
El mar, 25-01-2005 a las 17:38, Matt Kettler escribió:
> At 10:03 AM 1/25/2005, Eneko Lacunza wrote:
> >So this means that spammers can easily blacklist any domain they wish...
> >:) Quite curious. It seems I can't do anything about this, really.
> >Thanks a lot for your help Santiago :)
> Act
At 10:03 AM 1/25/2005, Eneko Lacunza wrote:
So this means that spammers can easily blacklist any domain they wish...
:) Quite curious. It seems I can't do anything about this, really.
Thanks a lot for your help Santiago :)
Actually, there is something you can do about it. Razor has a revoke
mechan
Hi,
So this means that spammers can easily blacklist any domain they wish...
:) Quite curious. It seems I can't do anything about this, really.
Thanks a lot for your help Santiago :)
Regards
El mar, 25-01-2005 a las 15:56, Santiago Vila escribió:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Eneko Lacunza wrote:
>
>
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Eneko Lacunza wrote:
> Thanks a lot Dörfler; I tryied to find docs online but didn't found the
> FAQ, sorry for my original message.
>
> So, can someone explain why Razor says my original message
> (original-message.txt) is reported and spam with more than 50%
> probability (
