[rb-general] Quick reproducible test for GNU Guix

2020-02-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
I did some quick reproducibility testing running GNU Guix, and so far got pretty good results: Using guix (and packages) built from commit: f83d07f7778b699d46741a5667113342f5f0a737 $ guix challenge --verbose --diff=diffoscope ... 2,463 store items were analyzed: - 2,016 (81.9%) were identica

Re: [rb-general] Quick reproducible test for GNU Guix

2020-02-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Vagrant! Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > I did some quick reproducibility testing running GNU Guix, and so far > got pretty good results: > > Using guix (and packages) built from commit: > > f83d07f7778b699d46741a5667113342f5f0a737 > > $ guix challenge --verbose --diff=diffoscope ... > 2,463 s

Re: [rb-general] Quick reproducible test for GNU Guix

2020-02-12 Thread Christopher Baines
Ludovic Courtès writes: >> Eventually, I'd like to do more systematic test of guix packages, with >> published logs per-package, rather than whatever I happened to build on >> the system so far, but this was a quick start to help flesh out ideas >> for feature requests to "guix challenge" to mak

Re: [rb-general] Quick reproducible test for GNU Guix

2020-02-28 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Vagrant, On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:08:59PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > I did some quick reproducibility testing running GNU Guix, and so far > got pretty good results: > > Using guix (and packages) built from commit: > f83d07f7778b699d46741a5667113342f5f0a737 > > $ guix challenge --v