Hi,
Mattia Rizzolo (2023-03-01):
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 10:55:41AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> > Does it support disk partitions or do I missing something?
>>
>> The short answer is that that diffoscope *should* support comparing your
>> partition images properly, instead of falling back to a
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023, at 02:09, John Gilmore wrote:
> I have been surprised at how much effort has gone into "diffoscope" as a
> total fraction of the Reproducible Builds effort.
How do you know?
> Perhaps it is a case
> akin to the drunk looking for his keys under the streetlight where he
> can s
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 10:07:33PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I daresay it is more akin to someone looking for lost keys by inventing
> a flashlight to look near where they dropped them, and they happen to
> have dropped the keys into a bin with miscelaneous arbitrary pieces and
> bits of th
Hello,
On 01/03/2023 22:59, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
...
... The file tree and the data files' content is only
a part of a bootable ISO 9660 image. There's executable code in the
blind spots of such a view: MBR legacy BIOS boot code, EFI programs in
the EFI partition, "hidde
On 2023-03-01, John Gilmore wrote:
>>> So, overall, I actually don't think that diffoscope has the requested
>>> support, and it's not "just" a bug of failed identification.
>
> I have been surprised at how much effort has gone into "diffoscope" as a
> total fraction of the Reproducible Builds effo
>> So, overall, I actually don't think that diffoscope has the requested
>> support, and it's not "just" a bug of failed identification.
I have been surprised at how much effort has gone into "diffoscope" as a
total fraction of the Reproducible Builds effort. Perhaps it is a case
akin to the drun
Hi,
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I already knew that hybrid ISO 9660 are pretty much devil's offspring,
> and I guess I could have done without your introduction to them /o\
Since i am helping to create them i feel obligated to warn the public.
{:)
> FWIW, currently diffoscope _does_ have a iso9660
Hello Thomas,
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 09:44:56PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> There are various layouts. Some are quite awkward and invite for getting
> lost in the woods. (Actually they lure firmwares out of the woods.)
Duh.
I already knew that hybrid ISO 9660 are pretty much devil's offspring
Hi,
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> So, overall, I actually don't think that diffoscope has the requested
> support, and it's not "just" a bug of failed identification.
If it gets support for detecting partitions in image files then it will
have to handle hybrid bootable ISO 9660 images which bear partit
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your replay, please see my inline comments.
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris Lamb
>Sent: 01 March 2023 16:26
>To: pyla venkata(ＴＳＩＰ TMIEC ODG Porting) tsip.com>; rb-general
>Subject: Re: Does diffoscope compares disk partitions
>
>Hey Venka
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 10:55:41AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Does it support disk partitions or do I missing something?
>
> The short answer is that that diffoscope *should* support comparing your
> partition images properly, instead of falling back to a raw
> xxd(1) comparison. The reason diff
Hey Venkata,
> Does it support disk partitions or do I missing something?
The short answer is that that diffoscope *should* support comparing your
partition images properly, instead of falling back to a raw
xxd(1) comparison. The reason diffoscope doesn't do that right now is
either due to a bug,
Hi,
I am using diffscope to compare two images that are created using yocto wks
files that means the image has partitions, and it doesn't produce any output
and exited after some time.
Below is the debug output of the diffoscope
===
$ diffoscope --debug image1.wic image2.wic
2023-02-27
13 matches
Mail list logo
