Congrats everyone. This is massive!
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 07:38:42AM +0100, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> We are happy to announce the release of GNU Mes 0.25!
>
> Although it's been only nine months since the previous release, this
> release represents 116 commits over two years by six
On 08/11/2023 16.38, Pol Dellaiera wrote:
you define functions doing I/O as Impure functions.
But without I/O, no build output can be written, so all builds must use
impure functions.
In practice we see non-determinism from approx 10 sources, such as
documented in
Haha it's totally fine :)
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023, 14:02 Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 11:02:47AM +0100, Pol Dellaiera wrote:
> > I just pushed a commit to actually publish it, hope it's ok !
>
> I've seen those two commits pass by on IRC and the fact that they
> were not coming
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 09:16:38AM +0100, aho...@0w.se wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 07:38:42AM +0100, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > We are happy to announce the release of GNU Mes 0.25!
> Regrettably, the post includes a reference to [...]
an, stop this *now*. Your repeated hostile
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 11:02:47AM +0100, Pol Dellaiera wrote:
> I just pushed a commit to actually publish it, hope it's ok !
I've seen those two commits pass by on IRC and the fact that they
were not coming from Chris *and* included the words "report for November"
(albeit in the commit
Chris,
I just pushed a commit to actually publish it, hope it's ok !
On 11/11/23 10:18, Chris Lamb wrote:
Chris Lamb wrote:
Please review the draft for October's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for October's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-10/
.. and also consider retweeting:
