Irregular status update about reproducible live-build ISO images

2024-02-27 Thread Roland Clobus
Hello lists, here is the 23th update of the status for reproducible live-build ISO images [1]. Single line summary: 97.7% reproducible live images Reproducible status: * All major desktops build reproducibly with bullseye, bookworm, trixie and sid ... ** ... provided they are built for a

Re: Two questions about build-path reproducibility in Debian

2024-02-27 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2024-02-15, James Addison via rb-general wrote: > A quick recap: in July 2023, Debian's package build infrastructure > (buildd) intentionally began using a fixed directory path during > package builds (bug #1034424). Previously, some string randomness > existed within each source build

Re: reprotest: inadvertent misconfiguration in salsa-ci config

2024-02-27 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2024-02-27, Chris Lamb wrote: >> * Update reprotest to handle a single-disabled-varations-value as a >> special case - treating it as vary and/or emitting a warning. Well, I would broaden this to include an arbitrary number of negating options: --variations=-time,-build_path That seems

Re: reprotest: inadvertent misconfiguration in salsa-ci config

2024-02-27 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi James, Great post, thank you. So, I'm in two minds re. the way forward: > * Update reprotest to handle a single-disabled-varations-value as a > special case - treating it as vary and/or emitting a warning. On whether to magically/transparently fix this, needless to say, it's considered bad