On 2024-04-01, kpcyrd wrote:
> in February I printed about 2k stickers to manifest the concept of
> reviewing source code, picturing a bug throwing a party within the
> codebases nobody reads.
>
> I usually spread these in my communities in person, due to recent events
> I've decided to give
.
We have a build-tool workaround for that in place [2]
Ciao
Bernhard M.
[1]
https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20240331/diffs/java-21-openjdk-compare.out
[2]
https://github.com/bmwiedemann/openSUSE/blob/54e27e1/packages/_/_project/_config#L19-L20
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Hi James,
> Approximately thirty are still set to other severity levels, and I plan to
> update those with the following adjusted messaging […]
Looks good to me. :)
Completely out of interest, are any of those 30 bugs tagged both
"buildpath" and "toolchain"? It's written nowhere in Policy (and
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 03:30:57PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2024-03-30, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On 2024-03-30, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 07:38:35PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> >>> Philipp Kern asked about trying to do reproducible builds
Hello lists,
here is the 24th update of the status for reproducible live-build ISO
images [1].
Single line summary: 79.5% reproducible live images (yup, lower than
last time; see below for the calculation)
Reproducible status:
* All major desktops build reproducibly with bullseye,
