Re: Please review the draft for March's report

2024-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen
Dear Chris et al, On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:52:39PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: > This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. great, thank you and everyone involved indeed! I also like the final order of the

Re: Please review the draft for March's report

2024-04-11 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-03/ .. and also consider retweeting:

Re: New supply-chain security tool: backseat-signed

2024-04-11 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 04:30:44PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > But, it is conventional for Autotools projects to ship the generated > ./configure script *as well* (for example this is what `make dist` > outputs), to allow the project to be compiled on systems that do not > have the complete

Re: Please review the draft for March's report

2024-04-11 Thread kpcyrd
On 4/10/24 7:12 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: Thank you for all the feedback so far. Unless someone makes these changes to the draft themselves, I will attend to this (and all the other critiques here and on Salsa) before publishing. Thank you! I noticed I submitted the backseat-signed tool in early