Man, haven't seen one of these in a while!
No affiliation, blah, blah.
http://portland.craigslist.org/mlt/bik/4059216795.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
What were the niches that the Redwood and Romulus were meant to fill? I
thought they might be larger Rams, but someone posted a link to a 64 cm Ram.
Were they simply earlier iterations of the road bike with generous
clearances?
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Norman Bone wrote:
> Man, haven'
Less expensive Rams sold as complete bikes. $1400 in 2003 for the whole bike!
Best deal ever. Functionally same as Ram in every way.
On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:13 AM, Patrick Moore wrote:
> What were the niches that the Redwood and Romulus were meant to fill? I
> thought they might be larger Rams,
Redwoods came in two sizes--both very tall. "Tall" frames for tall riders
was the niche. They were the tallest bikes Rivendell made at the time.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Patrick Moore wrote:
> What were the niches that the Redwood and Romulus were meant to fill? I
> thought they might
http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/romulus/
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 10:13:28 AM UTC-4, Patrick Moore wrote:
>
> What were the niches that the Redwood and Romulus were meant to fill? I
> thought they might be larger Rams, but someone posted a link to a 64 cm Ram.
>
> Were they simply earlier
Got it! Thanks.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Leslie wrote:
> http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/romulus/
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 10:13:28 AM UTC-4, Patrick Moore wrote:
>
>> What were the niches that the Redwood and Romulus were meant to fill? I
>> thought they might be large
