Re: [RBW] Another perspective, by George!

2012-12-12 Thread numbnuts
Hey All, Grant his the courage to speak his mind. I like this, but it almost ensures that any one person will not like everything Grant says. That includes myself. The one recurring thing I hear inside my head while reading something from Grant is that he loves bikes as much as I do. That does

Re: [RBW] Another perspective, by George!

2012-12-12 Thread jimD
+1 And for myself, no matter what Grant writes, if I agree or disagree, I thoroughly enjoy how he writes. -JimD On Dec 11, 2012, at 3:59 PM, PATRICK MOORE wrote: > I tried to stay away from this thread, but this post makes me speak. > > I haven't read the book, but I've read most of what Gran

Re: [RBW] Another perspective, by George!

2012-12-12 Thread numbnuts
Hey All, Just for the sake of clarity, I am the OP and the only other post on this particular subject/thread from me was the very first one in which I shared the review of JR that 'george the cyclist' had written. So, not only did I not make mention of anything relating to cannabis, the Rastafar

Re: [RBW] Another perspective, by George!

2012-12-12 Thread James Warren
Yes! Hit the nail on the head. That's all I need to see on this topic. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 10, 2012, at 2:19 PM, soapscum wrote: > His criticism of the book is based on a lack of attention to details of those > things the book is specifically NOT about. Brilliant. It's like saying you

Re: [RBW] Another perspective, by George!

2012-12-11 Thread soapscum
His criticism of the book is based on a lack of attention to details of those things the book is specifically NOT about. Brilliant. It's like saying you hated 'Skyfall' because it wasn't a western. On Monday, December 10, 2012 11:43:13 AM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote: > My reaction exactly. He s

Re: [RBW] Another perspective, by George!

2012-12-10 Thread Aaron Thomas
From: Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery > > >Sent: Dec 10, 2012 9:55 AM > >To: rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com > >Subject: [RBW] Another perspective, by George! > > > >George isn't the world's clearest writer. Did he like the book, or > dislike the book?

Re: [RBW] Another perspective, by George!

2012-12-10 Thread James Warren
It's pretty nitpicky. -Original Message- >From: Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery >Sent: Dec 10, 2012 9:55 AM >To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com >Subject: [RBW] Another perspective, by George! > >George isn't the world's clearest writer. Did he like the

Re: [RBW] Another perspective, by George!

2012-12-10 Thread Anne Paulson
My reaction exactly. He spent three paragraphs obsessing about some details about Tour de France trivia that Grant misstated. I'm sure that diehard TdF fans care about them, but most people don't. On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: > George isn't the world's clea

[RBW] Another perspective, by George!

2012-12-10 Thread Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
George isn't the world's clearest writer. Did he like the book, or dislike the book? Hard to tell. Clearly he's got an axe to grind, but his criticisms are pretty unfocused. The most specific criticism is that some racing stats were inaccurate? -- You received this message because you are subs

Re: [RBW] Another perspective, by George!

2012-12-10 Thread Peter Morgano
Book has been out for what, 5 months and now a review? End of year sour grapes edition or something? Pretty nastily written when he has to harp on for almost a whole paragraph about how long the book was or wasnt. I think what people like this george person miss is that sarcasm and wit are funny,

[RBW] Another perspective, by George!

2012-12-10 Thread numbnuts
http://georgethecyclist.blogspot.com/2012/12/grant-petersons-racing-acumen.html Regards, Chris Redding, Ca. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners