Glad you got that 62, John!
I must say, that was the most perfectly appointed second hand bike I've
ever had my hands on. Literally nothing to change except maaaybe the tires.
Alas, I've been in idle negotiations for two of 'em, but neither one
totally did it for me.
Jeff Hagedorn
Los Angeles
Jeff’s sharp eye for Quickbeam headtubes is how I ended up with my 62. Jeff,
did you ever get a 60?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owne
On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 3:17:30 PM UTC-4, Philip Williamson wrote:
>
> I use headtube length as a quick visual estimation of frame size. "No way
> that ad is really for a 57cm bike!"
>
>
This usually works for me too but only if factoring in tire clearance. For
instance a 60cm cross ch
I use headtube length as a quick visual estimation of frame size. "No way
that ad is really for a 57cm bike!"
Philip
Santa Rosa, CA
On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 4:15:28 PM UTC-7, Dave Grossman wrote:
>
> Yes. But that can be easily messed up if not to the right spot of the
> lug. And the
Ha, no nothing like that! Just bike geometry OCD!
Yeah, it would still plane!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@
Cool. I was imagining something more like an archaeology dig or crash site,
where you only had the head tube and had to ID the bike based upon that
It does raise sort of an existential question about frame sizes though: If
you measure a seat tube to be 56 cm and it's really a 58 cm, will it
Yes. But that can be easily messed up if not to the right spot of the lug.
And the 56 and 58 are close in the top tube. I just want some extra data.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Okay, I'm curious. Wouldn't it be easier to ID a Quickbeam by just
measuring the seat tube?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunc
So the 58 is likely a 170 in between is my guess.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to t
Head tube on my 56CM Quickbeam is 15CM overall (between the headset cups).
--Eric Norris
campyonly...@me.com
@CampyOnlyguy (Twitter/Instagram)
> On Aug 13, 2018, at 12:29 PM, Dave Grossman wrote:
>
> In order to help me ID a Quickbeam sizewise, can any owners help me out?
>
> Can you tell
In order to help me ID a Quickbeam sizewise, can any owners help me out?
Can you tell me your respective headtube lengths for a 56, 58, and 60?
Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
11 matches
Mail list logo
