I'm running cantilevers on my 52cm Clem just fine. The original concept
spec for the Clems also said either V or cantis worked great on it. I'm
using a standard Tektro binder bolt hanger on the rear and the Tektro
fork-mounted one on the front.
Matter o'fact, here's a canti'd Clementine from th
I have cantis on my Clem as well. I'm considering the step-through
Clementine specifically with the tight angle in the Riv photo. I have
pulley already that has a built-in cable stop adjuster, curious if others
have gone this route. It's certainly not a dealbreaker, if I decide on
buying it the
I guess I just never found the bend to be that tight? I'd put'em on a
Clementine without a second thought and not fuss with the pulleys, But I
also like the look of looping housing on step throughs, so maybe I'm just
odd like that.
On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 12:07:04 PM UTC-5, David Banze
I originally built my 2 Clementines with V brakes because I thought cable
routing would be a issue for Cantilevers, but the long chain stays translate to
reasonably uncluttered seat stays as well & because I don't like V brakes I
quickly reverted to my trusty Canti's!
I was able to snag a like
Looking at the Riv picture, it seems like a longer cable hanger for the
rear (like the Nitto or Surly) would allow for a more gradual curve in the
housing under the seat.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Zed Martinez
wrote:
> I'm running cantilevers on my 52cm Clem just fine. The original conce
Thanks Tim. Somehow I hadn't seen Surly's hanger and now want that on my
Clem too. It was a tight bend with the Tektro back there.
On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 11:51:59 AM UTC-5, Tim Gavin wrote:
>
> Looking at the Riv picture, it seems like a longer cable hanger for the
> rear (like the Nit
