Re: [RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-19 Thread CycloFiend
on 12/18/09 9:45 PM, Rene Sterental at orthie...@gmail.com wrote: > PS.- Today was Mark's birthday and they were all celebrating it with a nice > BBQ and sweet goodies! It was all very cool, even if Mark was the one taking > care of the BBQ...!!! Among his other talents, Mark is the master of the

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-19 Thread Mike
Rene, I just now looked at the pictures of your bike and it looks beautiful. Proportionally it looks "right". Sure, I can see how riding a bike with a little less SO height could be concerning but unless you're riding super technical trails I think you'll be fine. That green color on your bike is p

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-19 Thread EricP
Another one who is totally jealous of your bike and build. That deep green is beautiful. For some reason, my now favorite color on a Bombadil is green. As to sizing, when getting my Atlantis, decided to go small. Probably too small. Grant would never have let me do it. Wanted enough standove

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-19 Thread Angus
I want one too! Angus On Dec 18, 11:51 pm, cyclotourist wrote: > Well heck, now I want one! > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Rene Sterental wrote: > > So I went to Rivendell today around noon and I have to say they were all in > > awe of the finished bike. They loved how I built it,

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-19 Thread newenglandbike
Dang, the bike does look awesome! It sounds like you found out the right size, and can feel confident you made the right choice. On Dec 19, 12:45 am, Rene Sterental wrote: > So I went to Rivendell today around noon and I have to say they were all in > awe of the finished bike. They loved how I

Re: [RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-19 Thread Robert F. Harrison
That Bombadil is lovely. I rode a 64cm back in March when I was visiting the Bay Area and lusted after one for quite some time. I managed overcome the urge with my very recent Quickbeam purchase but now you've gone and gotten me thinking again. I'm 6'1" with a 95 PBH and I ended up with a 66cm Qui

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread Philip Williamson
The Riv sizing parameters have some leeway. I'm 6'2" with a 95cm PBH, and I ride a 60cm Quickbeam. I could fit a 60, 62, or 64, and I got the smallest size I'd fit, in order to ride fat knobbies offroad. So far (almost six years) it's been perfect. I also ride a 63.5" touring fixie, but not on sing

Re: [RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread Rene Sterental
Well said, Mike. Changing paradigms always requires the student to trust the mentor. Based on my experience with the purchase of my Homer, as well as my past history with other fit "experts", I am more than willing to trust Grant and his assessments. It didn't hurt at all that as soon as I tested

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread Mike
Rene, I'm glad you're happy with your bike. It's a beautiful bike. Rivendell sizing takes a certain amount of trust and maybe isn't for everyone. --mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rb

Re: [RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread cyclotourist
Well heck, now I want one! On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Rene Sterental wrote: > So I went to Rivendell today around noon and I have to say they were all in > awe of the finished bike. They loved how I built it, how the polished Paul > Neo-Retro and Canti look on the dark green frame, and wer

Re: [RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread Rene Sterental
So I went to Rivendell today around noon and I have to say they were all in awe of the finished bike. They loved how I built it, how the polished Paul Neo-Retro and Canti look on the dark green frame, and were full of compliments. In fact, John said he now wanted to place an order for a dark green

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread rcnute
This "go down by one size" has worked pretty well for me with Riv frames. Ryan On Dec 18, 9:39 am, doug peterson wrote: > Rene: > > After all the data points regarding the bigger size, here's one vote > for going smaller.  I understand Riv's sizing system and philosophy, > but chose to go a size

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread jinxed
Rene, I am very in tune with your dilemma. I have been able to get my Bombadil off road on some familiar trails. And now I am fearing I have chosen the wrong size, or frame all together. I have never had any issues with stand over clearance in the past, but on 2 of my 3 singletrack rides on the Bo

Re: [RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread Rene Sterental
Thanks for all the feedback. You've all narrowed down on the core issue and its related variables and points of consideration. I'm leaving now to drive to Rivendell and test ride the 56 Bombadil and compare it to my 60. Will send an update when I get back. René -- You received this message becau

Re: [RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread Bill Connell
I'll put in a vote for the smaller size as well, but it's a tough call. If you're planning to use the bike for mostly touring, the larger size might arguably be more comfortable. For mostly MTB trail riding, i'd pick the smaller frame. I'm 6'4", 93cm PBH and have done plenty of trail/gravel riding

Re: [RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread Dustin Sharp
t; From: newenglandbike > Reply-To: > Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:05:56 -0800 (PST) > To: RBW Owners Bunch > Subject: [RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size... > > I think you'll most likely be fine on either size since, as a previous > post points out, the Bombadil is desig

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread newenglandbike
Just to clarify my last post- I think it could definitely be a very good thing to have the bars higher than the saddle - especially for long-D touring purposes.So if the 60 lets you do that and you can still stand over it, that's something to consider too. Sorry I'm not being of more help!

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread newenglandbike
I think you'll most likely be fine on either size since, as a previous post points out, the Bombadil is designed to fit a wide range of PBHs. Also since it's a mountain bike, it's optimized to work well with something like dirt drop (or similar stem) & you won't really have an issue getting the

Re: [RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread Dustin Sharp
en becomes an issue. All FWIW, ATMO, etc, etc. > From: Doug Peterson > Reply-To: > Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:39:20 -0800 (PST) > To: RBW Owners Bunch > Subject: [RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size... > > Rene: > > After all the data points regarding the bigger size, here

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread doug peterson
Rene: After all the data points regarding the bigger size, here's one vote for going smaller. I understand Riv's sizing system and philosophy, but chose to go a size down from their recommendation on my Atlantis (58 cm vs 61 cm). Coming up on 7 happy years of riding, I've never given it a second

Re: [RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread Paul Sanders
I have a 64cm Quickbeam and 64cm Bombadil. I think they both fit. I have much less clearance on the Bombadil, but I don't really notice it for how I ride the bike. I'm currently running moustache bars on the Quickbeam with a dirt drop stem, and Velo Orange Milano bars on the Bombadil. I could have

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread Dave Craig
René I went through this dilemma with RBW as well - though I actually went through THREE different frame sizes on one bike. That's a long story . . . Anyway, as you mention, RBW does stand by their advice and they will work with you to meet your needs. As for sizing, I comfortably ride a 64cm fra

[RBW] Re: Correct Bombadil size...

2009-12-18 Thread Angus
Rene, Like David I have an 89cm PBH. I have a 59cm All-Rounder I have used off-road without any issues. My road Rivendell's are now all 64cm with essentially zero crotch clearance (Rivendell would have put me on a slightly smaller frame). For a short time I road a 62cm Jamis Cyclocross bike off