I'm looking at my 62 cm and it looks straight to me. Am I missing something?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/14724719@N08/7360074294/
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 9:08:01 AM UTC-7, Rocky B wrote:
>
> I've seen pictures of a 62cm Bettys and Yves Gomezs on the 'net and they
> all had the "kink" look to
I've seen pictures of a 62cm Bettys and Yves Gomezs on the 'net and they
all had the "kink" look to them. I hope this isn't a one-off and its the
new style.
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:39:07 AM UTC-5, Jeremy Till wrote:
>
> I also think it's a function of size, probably related to the challeng
I also think it's a function of size, probably related to the challenges of
attaching 3 sets of stays to the rear dropout; on the smaller frames they
have to have the kink so the mid-stays stay below the seat stays. On the
larger frames, maybe, the greater angle between chain and seat stays all
Hey, that's my bike!
Yes, the top tube is in line with the middle set of stays. And the fork has
more bend too. I personally feel this line is much more aesthetically
pleasing, and was surprised and pleased when it arrived this way (September
2011). I think the change only applies to my size (
I am leaning towards the, function of the size a smaller one, there
ends up being an angle change, but this one is big enough that the line can
continue through
Does look better...
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:34:20 AM UTC-4, Peter Pesce wrote:
>
> Interesting theory.
> Assuming th
Interesting theory.
Assuming the "rule" is that the diagonal bisects the rear triangle, maybe
larger frames move the midpoint of the seat tube up to the point where it
aligns the top tube. The bike has 650B wheels, so the biggest it could be
is a 58.
If only there was some way we could ask the
I did too, much prefer a straight line.. Would this be a new future style
of betty and yves or just a one off?
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 9:10:53 AM UTC-5, Peter Pesce wrote:
>
> Hmm. I think you're right. I always disliked the "bent" line also.
>
>
> -Pete in CT
>
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 1:1
Nice lookin' bike.The straight line definitely looks good.
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:10:53 AM UTC-4, Peter Pesce wrote:
>
> Hmm. I think you're right. I always disliked the "bent" line also.
>
>
> -Pete in CT
>
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 1:14:43 AM UTC-4, Rocky B wrote:
>>
>> Take a loo
Hmm. I think you're right. I always disliked the "bent" line also.
-Pete in CT
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 1:14:43 AM UTC-4, Rocky B wrote:
>
> Take a look at the frame lines of this Betty Foy:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/10344790@N06/7514719444/in/pool-rivendell
>
> Is it me or does it looks
