On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 12:05:05 PM UTC-4, iamkeith wrote:
>
>
> - Even though I won't need one, I got curious and decided to check the
> news regarding the Ravn progress, over on the rCog forum. Looks like that
> project might be dead. Or at least its not going to be the uber-bike
Thanks for the background, Rod. I assumed I was ignorant about some
details, and probably leaving out others, and didn't take time to read all
of the latest developments. I had gotten pretty excited about the bike
when it was first announced, and even thought hard about getting one
- before
What rims are you using, by the way?
Here's mine, a Surly Trucker DeLuxe with Rat Trap Pass Extralights mounted
> under Planet Bike Cascadia ATB fenders; I've taken to calling it the
> Monster Trucker. Like it a lot...
>
>
> rod
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Sun Rhyno Lite rims (27.5mm width, if memory serves), on Chris King hubs.
rod
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Thansk for the 411 on that, Rod!
I'm liking the looks of the Ulv as well: http://ravn.rawlandcycles.com/#ulv
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 6:32:47 AM UTC-7, Rod Holland wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 12:05:05 PM UTC-4, iamkeith wrote:
>>
>>
>> - Even though I won't need one, I
Well, in my initial fit of enthusiasm, I guess mis-spoke a couple of things:
- My rims are 517, not 519 - so same 17mm internal width (22mm external)
as yours, Tim. They sure seem narrow, but I'm glad to hear they've worked
well for you.
- The tires have now stretched quite a bit, so I
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:21 PM, iamkeith wrote:
> DO THESE TIRES MAKE MY BIKE LOOK SKINNY?
> ord at the moment. Can these 519 (19mm) Mavic rims [see pic. below]
> possibly give enough support for a tire this wide? My gut says "no way,"
> but I'd love it if someone could
DO THESE TIRES MAKE MY BIKE LOOK SKINNY?
I finally got a chance to install and try the RTPs on my AR, during a nice,
long, autumn day ride on some dirt forest service roads. I was hoping I
wouldn't like them. I mean, we eventually have to reach a point of
diminishing returns, when wider is
Oh, I don't want a 29er for singletrack; I love 29ers for dirt, and think
they roll better than 26er over smaller obstacles, but for singletrack I
want a bike with smaller wheels. I have a Fargo, shortly to be replaced,
God willing, with a Matthews Custom Cycles custom "road bike for dirt"
What Steve said.
A 29x3" tire. Not quite a fat bike (>4") but larger than your everyday 29er
hovering around 2.25".
A 27.5+ wheel (3") seems like the "it" size of the moment, especially as
you can retrofit them into a 29er frame that can fit a 29X2.4" tire.
But as I mentioned above... mass. I
Someone has good tastes!
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Patrick Moore wrote:
> That's the very one I saw in the stand this morning, down to color. Nice
> bike, but more $$ than I need to spend.
>
> Frankly, a bike that fits the 26 X 3 Knard would be wonderful.
>
> On
Nice bike, btw.
Patrick Moore, who talked at length this morning with the Western States
Jamis rep (parked at Fat Tire Cycles) about the demise of 26" and the new
so-called 27.5" Plus -- Jamis has a new model for a 3" 27.5 tire; too bad I
don't have $2,700.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:28 PM,
Regarding 19 mm rims (are you measuring inside to inside, or outside to
outside? 19 mm is *very* narrow; my Sun M14As and ME14As are 19 outside to
outside, but these are exceptionally narrow even for narrow rims. I use 19
mm o-to-o rims for narrow (26") road tires.
That said, the 559 M14As were
On 10/09/2015 09:52 PM, iamkeith wrote:
Thanks. And my advice is to skip the 27.5 plus thing altogether,
wait in the wings and save you pennies, and just go straight for 29+.
It's kind of a good parallel to the Rivendell/Rawland/Compass
experience. The mainstream industry wants to sell
>From my conversation with the Jamis rep this morning, I think that adding
"Plus" to a designation means that the wheels and frame are made for 3"
tires, and that the frame doesn't require special fat bike bb shells,
bearing assemblies, or rear spacing (tho' the Jamis on display had a 148 mm
OL
I agree; even the Jamis rep said that the "27.5+" schtick is very new,
toute 2015, and that after a couple of years one will have many more
choices and lower costs.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:52 PM, iamkeith wrote:
> Thanks. And my advice is to skip the 27.5 plus thing
That's the very one I saw in the stand this morning, down to color. Nice
bike, but more $$ than I need to spend.
Frankly, a bike that fits the 26 X 3 Knard would be wonderful.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:30 PM, cyclotour...@gmail.com <
cyclotour...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I meant what Patrick said.
>
Well I didn't actually even measure them, but I'm under the impression that
Mavic's naming standard is based on the *actual/interior* measurement. So,
in this case, 519 is a lower grade/heavier series rim than a 719, but both
are 19mm wide? I'll measure the outer width just to make sure.
On
Thanks. And my advice is to skip the 27.5 plus thing altogether, wait in
the wings and save you pennies, and just go straight for 29+. It's kind of
a good parallel to the Rivendell/Rawland/Compass experience. The
mainstream industry wants to sell you whatever trend they're cooking, but
the
I don't know... my regular 29ers are way heavy with a lot of inertia...
there's a lot of mass there. 29+ just seems like I'd be moving a lot more
rubber and metal around. 27.5+ seems a lot more reasonable to work with.
Especially with a diameter/circumference similar to a regular 29er
I meant what Patrick said.
Here's a real nice B+ bike: http://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/dragonslayer.html
But really more bike than I need to pay the premium to get it.
On Friday, October 9, 2015 at 7:27:30 PM UTC-7, cyclot...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> What Steve said.
>
> A 29x3" tire. Not quite a
One possible exception: My disk specific, 700C X 30 mm outside width rims,
at sub 450 grams, with Furious Freds, 360 real grams at 50 mm wide and no
tubes --- pretty damned light.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:22 PM, cyclotour...@gmail.com <
cyclotour...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know... my regular
Wow, that Jamis does look like a nice bike. I didn't mean to send this
thread so off-course, but should respond. I clung to small wheels on my
mountain bikes and held out a long, long time before getting a 29er, and
now kind of regret it. But then I was lucky that the 29er I did eventually
I like how you categorized the Jones as a mixte... never thought about it
it, but yeah, you're right!
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:39 PM, iamkeith wrote:
> Wow, that Jamis does look like a nice bike. I didn't mean to send this
> thread so off-course, but should respond. I
Thanks, Bill. That's what I needed to hear. Now to mount them up and try
to get a few rides in during the next couple of weeks before the snow
starts flying. Not much tread on these things...
On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 6:07:01 PM UTC-6, Bill Lindsay wrote:
>
> It is my understanding
Would anyone happen to know how the older "Compass" 26x1.75 tires compare,
in terms of equivalency, to the standard and extra-light casing versions
of the Rat Trap Pass tires? The website doesn't really say, and I haven't
gotten a response to an email inquiry to Jan.
I bought a pair
It is my understanding that the Compass 1.75 tires have a casing that is
much more similar to the standard RTP casing. I expect the difference in
width will dwarf the casing difference. In terms of equivalence I think
you picked the right model (the standard RTP).
On Monday, September 28,
I'd love to try out the Switchback Hills on my Sam but have to wear my
Surly Knards and CdlVs (budget tires, at about $15 apiece) before I'll be
willing to spring for them.
Please post pictures (and possibly actual measurements) anyone who mounts
the Switchbacks!
On Friday, August 28, 2015
I have an Atlantis and worry about clearance too. Would you post your
clearance results (perhaps a photo too)?
Thanks,
Will
On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 8:12:31 PM UTC-5, Pondero wrote:
Just ordered a pair of Rat Trap Pass tires for the Atlantis. I think the
clearance will be a bit
I am *so happy* this gets posted two days after I make the commitment to
reign in all my spending before my wedding.
SO.
HAPPY.
:/
-J
On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 11:35:24 AM UTC-7, Zack wrote:
my kingdom* for a fatter 700c compass tire than the barlow pass.
(i do not actually have a
my kingdom* for a fatter 700c compass tire than the barlow pass.
(i do not actually have a kingdom)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
be careful about signing any documents!!! ;-P
=- Joe
On 8/28/15, Justin August justin.aug...@icloud.com wrote:
I am *so happy* this gets posted two days after I make the commitment to
reign in all my spending before my wedding.
SO.
HAPPY.
:/
-J
On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 11:35:24
The 622 x 60 Super Moto is a worthy stand-in, if you can fit it.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Zack zack...@gmail.com wrote:
my kingdom* for a fatter 700c compass tire than the barlow pass.
(i do not actually have a kingdom)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
http://www.bike24.com/1.php?content=8;navigation=1;menu=1000%2C2%2C103%2C212;search=super+moto+29;product=101777
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Tim Gavin tim.ga...@littlevillagemag.com
wrote:
The 622 x 60 Super Moto is a worthy stand-in, if you can fit it.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:35 PM,
34 matches
Mail list logo