The shorter stem did feel a little different, but not bad in any way.
Anyway - I guess if 70 stems were so "wrong" I don't think GP would
stock them. Either way I don't really care. The bike fits perfectly now.
:)
On Sunday, May 12, 2013 3:20:43 PM UTC-5, NWAJack wrote:
> When I purch
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 07:37 -0600, PATRICK MOORE wrote:
> Use whatever works. I have to disagree with Grant when he says that
> top tube length matters relatively little.
That would be true for a narrow range of possibilities. Too little and
you can end up with a lot of toe overlap and a need to
Use whatever works. I have to disagree with Grant when he says that top
tube length matters relatively little. One complaint I had about the Sam
Hill was that the size 56 had a 59 cm tt which, for me, was quite a bit too
long since my roads have a ~57 tt and even those require 8 cm stems. The
only
Glad you too found the right stem. I'm running noodles also and like you have
a short reach I guess. It looks fine to me and I can ride in comfort. Thats
what counts.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from t
Dig this:
> A couple Rivfolks communicated to me *as if they did not cotton* to short
> stems on a bike, which is surprising since they are usually into whatever
> makes you comfy. I was really surprised to even read a derisive comment
> from one of them about the aesthetics of short stems. I w
Dig this:
Two of the Rivfolks communicated to me *as if they did not cotton* to short
stems on a bike, which is surprising since they are usually into whatever
makes you comfy. I was really surprised to even read a derisive comment
from one of them about the aesthetics of a short stem. I was s
