I'm still confused as to whether this will be sole as a frameset only. Did
this come up in conversation?
Also, what size did you ride?
On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 1:48:04 PM UTC-6, James Warren wrote:
>
> It was smooth and stable and comfortable and responsive, the way all Rivs
> are
So jealous. Clearance how much Clarence?
~Hugh
On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 11:48:04 AM UTC-8, James Warren wrote:
> It was smooth and stable and comfortable and responsive, the way all Rivs
> are. It's going to be a great bike. And tire clearance. Wow! Hunq-like.
>
> -Jim W.
>
> Sent fr
We want to get Clems complete, but cash flow never allows that these days,
so when they come (late '15?) they'll be available as framesets. There's
clearance for 55 with fender. Whenever we hit out target clearance, there's
always complaints (from us here, too!) that "well, too bad it won't fit
Amazing idea!
Grant, what's the biggest size Clems'll come in? Apologies if this has
already been answered elsewhere.
KJ
On Thursday, November 27, 2014 1:04:19 PM UTC-5, Grant Petersen wrote:
> .and the plan also is to offer a limited number without decals but with a
> multiple alphabet so
Any pictures? Jim D Massachusetts
On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:48:04 PM UTC-5, James Warren wrote:
>
> It was smooth and stable and comfortable and responsive, the way all Rivs
> are. It's going to be a great bike. And tire clearance. Wow! Hunq-like.
>
> -Jim W.
>
> Sent from my iP
To chime in some additional data, I'm 5'10.5" tall with an 85 PBH. I fit a
55cm Sam perfectly with the seat at 74cm from the center of the cranks.
Felt great during an extended test ride. I've also tried a 54cm
Hunqapillar that felt good and, to my surprise, a 58 Homer. All of them
felt goo
This visit today did not add any info about that; I didn't think of asking. I
generally ride frames in the 60's, and on this I didn't have to raise the
seatpost too much higher so I'm guessing it was the 59 cm. it fit me all right.
Bosco bar. My typical Riv size is 64 or 65 in the 2-degree TT sl
Enough for 700x55.
It looked like the Hunqapillar in the Clearance department.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 26, 2014, at 6:28 PM, hsmitham wrote:
> So jealous. Clearance how much Clarence?
>
> ~Hugh
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 11:48:04 AM UTC-8, James Warren wrote:
>> It was smo
It's got the clearance to run the interference.
-J
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post t
so far, 59...but that'll fit to pbh 95
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Kieran J wrote:
> Amazing idea!
>
> Grant, what's the biggest size Clems'll come in? Apologies if this has
> already been answered elsewhere.
>
> KJ
>
>
> On Thursday, November 27, 2014 1:04:19 PM UTC-5, Grant Petersen wrot
Would a mid-80's PBH (really hard to measure but saddle height of 74-75cm
and I can S.O. an 84cm top-tube without hitting bone) put me on a 52 with
650b wheels?
On Thursday, November 27, 2014 9:24:33 PM UTC-6, Grant Petersen wrote:
>
> so far, 59...but that'll fit to pbh 95
>
> On Thu, Nov 2
I am the same size as you Chris and am wondering the same thing. I'm afraid
on a 52 the tt will be too short for my taste.
On Nov 30, 2014 1:52 PM, "Jim D Massachusetts" wrote:
> Any pictures? Jim D Massachusetts
>
> On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:48:04 PM UTC-5, James Warren wrote:
>>
I prefer a short top-tube but I'm worried about how much seatpost will be
showing. I don't mind a lot of seatpost if the top-tube is sloped like a
modern MTB. Riv's 2/6 degrees just won't work with a lot of seatpost.
Actually, my primary concern is that I already have a set of Rich Lesnik
b
Chris,
If that Trek is a 52, the seatpost actually looks just about right.
for the era it was made. Funny how, once you know better, those old bikes
just don't seem right anymore. Another funny thing though is that a lot of
people still jack the post up even further when they take pho
Keith,
I'm just shy of 6' tall and I've always thought of myself as short legged
and longer torso'ed but I'm no longer sure that is accurate. My 1983 MTB
has a seat-tube of 57.5cm and a S.O. of 83 and I'm perfectly comfortable
riding it. In fact, I like how little seat-tube is showing and how
Chris:
Just for some more data points, I'm around 5'10" with an 85 cm PBH, and my
seat around 75 cm, on a 58 cm Atlantis with 38 mm Soma C-lines. I've also
used 40 mm Schwalbe Marathons. I would not ride anything bigger & could in
fact ride a 56 cm Atlantis. Hugh has a 56 shod with I believe
Keith, we have the same pbh but I am 5'11 with longish torso and short
arms, finding bikes that fit me is a pain . I was most recently riding a
56 bombadil. I am also in between on sizes. I wanted a Hunqapillar when
they came out but didn't want a yard of seatpost on the 54 and the 58 gave
me zero
17 matches
Mail list logo
