[RBW] Re: New Hunq 650b

I'm with you, Bill. But based on those other rumored sizes, it sure seems promising that a 56 or 57 might be in the works. I've complained so loud and for so long about that size being missing (I even had a pre-sale locked in when the model first came out, but backed out over concerns), that I

[RBW] Re: New Hunq 650b

What will the sizes be? On the instagram it claims to be a 53, and somebody asked about "the 59" like it's a think and Deacon says there is a 60. What are the nominal sizes? I was kind of tempted by the Hunqapillar at times, and thought the 54 was a little small, and the 58 was a little big.

[RBW] Re: New Hunq 650b

I talked with Riv yesterday, and they said that the new 60 Hunqapillar would have about 3cm longer chainstays than my original geometry 62 Hunqapillar. Sounds like it is mostly for increased tire clearance and won't be Appaloosa long. With abandon, Patrick On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 6:42:0

[RBW] Re: New Hunq 650b

For reference, here is a 54cm. On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 9:05:15 AM UTC-4, Chris Lampe 2 wrote: > > Chainstays don't look any longer, which I thought was also c

[RBW] Re: New Hunq 650b

I ordered a 58 Hunq in April after I caught wind of the impending 650b switch... I asked them on the phone and they (iirc it was Mark) said the 58 would stay 700c. On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 9:05:15 AM UTC-4, Chris Lampe 2 wrote: > > Chainstays don't look any longer, which I thought was al

[RBW] Re: New Hunq 650b

Chainstays don't look any longer, which I thought was also coming on the Hunqs. I hope RBW didn't size me out of the 650B Hunqs because I would prefer that over the 700c version. 53cm is definately too small and the old Hunq had pretty big jumps between sizes. On Wednesday, June 15, 2016