[RBW] Re: New vs. Old Parts for Appaloosa

2024-09-19 Thread Justin Kennedy
I think it's nice to have a mix of old and new parts on a build, but sourcing good quality used parts or NOS can be time consuming and expensive. I spent a substantial sum on a used rapid rise rear derailleur for my Platypus and *really* dig it. Is it better than a $20 Altus? Functionally no, b

[RBW] Re: New vs. Old Parts for Appaloosa

2024-09-18 Thread Michael Morrissey
Hi, I have this 10 speed derailleur on my Appaloosa with a Silver shifter doing a 9 speed 34 tooth cassette and it works great. https://www.sram.com/en/sram/models/rd-gx-t21-a1 I know everyone here is free to be a retrogrouch, but having a clutch derailleur and no chainslap or dropped chains i

[RBW] Re: New vs. Old Parts for Appaloosa

2024-09-18 Thread Matt Hayden
Another vote for older parts, if they're in good nick. For the most part, they Just Work^TM which is always good. They also reduce the volume of stuff going into the waste stream which seems pretty important these days. They're also repairable, which is a big deal. Some of the newer unit

[RBW] Re: New vs. Old Parts for Appaloosa

2024-09-17 Thread raw_meet
Agree with the other comments here, I use older shimano parts on a few bikes and am happy with the performance. Steel frames flex before cranksets for sure, in my experience. That said, cheap newer shimano derailleurs are kind of a key element of the modern rivendell aesthetic thanks to Grant's