The Romulus has Been sold
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web v
Sorry for the tardy reply Spencer, just saw this. That's what I suspected, two
different body types. My saddle is generally at 73 centimeters. Which means
this bike I
s probably the perfect size for me. But as I said, I have other bikes that are
too similar for me to be tempted by trying this on
Hi Mark, measuring from the center of the crank to the approximate top of the
saddle, measuring up the seat tube is about 79cm.
Stand over is around 81. Hard to get exact, trying to balance the bike and
holding the tape measure, while not letting my reading glasses slide down my
nose.
I measure
I did the Farmer's Daughter that year on a bike with centerpulls and 700 x
38-43 tires (can't remember which set I had on at the time). The main
problem with a non-canti or disc setup is the mud buildup under and along
the brake arms. I hosed off at the rest stop after partaking of the
whiskey-
So it's actually an RSX shifter modified to 105. Well ok then!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Hi All,
The bike that is listed on Hudson Valley CL is mine, you can ask me any
questions you might have.
The bike is in fact a 57cm.
I am 5’10” tall and the bike pictured is setup for me, it fits beautiful. I
have done all day rides on it and it has been my choice for high mileage
excursions.
Quoting a message I received from the seller:
“the seat tube, measured from center of BB to top of top tube is 57cm“
> On Jul 20, 2019, at 10:36 PM, Joe Bernard wrote:
>
> Yeah I think it's ok, it was a bit big on me (smallest they made). I'm just
> not sure that frame is a 57, but maybe.
>
Yeah I think it's ok, it was a bit big on me (smallest they made). I'm just not
sure that frame is a 57, but maybe.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e
Fit looks fine to me, and typical for many road bikes I’ve seen in this group.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@
Hopefully he'll take the proceeds and put it toward a bike that fits him
better.
On Saturday, July 20, 2019 at 7:26:24 PM UTC-4, Joe Bernard wrote:
>
> Nice bike, odd listing. That sure looks like a 55 to me (I had one), and
> his seat height for 5'-10" matches my guess. Also there's no way tha
10 matches
Mail list logo
