[RBW] Re: Roadeo in Bicycling magazine

2011-09-05 Thread stevep33
I picked up the issue for something to read at the airport. The Roadeo writeup was a pleasant surprise, and I was impressed that they didn't automatically write it off as a 20+ (gasp!) pound turd. The commentary was quite favorable. The comments on the Hampsten were a little more mixed, and to be

[RBW] Re: Roadeo in Bicycling magazine

2011-09-05 Thread Noel M.
+1 for Bicycle Times magazine. I LOVE LOVE LOVE this publication and can't wait for the next issue!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch

[RBW] Re: Roadeo in Bicycling magazine

2011-09-05 Thread Michael_S
I canceled my Bicycling subscription a few years ago. Just not what I wanted to read. My current fav's are Bicycle Times, Adventure Cyclist and Bicycle Quarterly. I do like Dirt Rag and Mountain Flyer is pretty good too. ~mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

[RBW] Re: Roadeo in Bicycling magazine

2011-09-05 Thread Kris
You are kind! The new editor has made some changes for the better, but I still find it to be more or less worthless. The producers of Dirt Rag have an effort called Bicycle Times that I recently discovered. I would recommend it to the RBW crowd. On Sep 4, 2:08 pm, cyclotourist wrote: > Bicycli

[RBW] Re: Roadeo in Bicycling magazine

2011-09-04 Thread EricP
Hmm. I did not read it that way at all. Then again, for me, it takes until 37mm to be "medium" and wide doesn't begin until past 40. Or maybe my Schwalbe Marathon Supreme 50s are wide. Or not. Then again, after a few years where no bike has had less than 35s on it, my perception of wide is dif