e public of their intention
> to change, the fallout would have been minimal conpared to what they must
> endure now.
>
> --
> *From:* Tim McNamara
> *To:* rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
> *Sent:* Friday, September 4, 2009 6:30:14 PM
> *Subj
2009 6:30:14 PM
Subject: [RBW] Re: Sick Siggs
On Sep 4, 2009, at 3:23 PM, R Gonet wrote:
> Apparently Sigg was selling aluminum water bottles with an interior
> coating containing bisphenol, which is supposed to be a bad thing.
> Grant has a post on the RBW site about this, under the
Of my entire post, the criticism of Sigg consisted of only one
sentence. My major point was that GP was being so apologetic about
the problem, that it wasn't necessary because it wasn't his doing, and
that this was just another example of his altruism (to quote Esteban),
which is another of the r
On Sep 4, 2009, at 3:23 PM, R Gonet wrote:
> Apparently Sigg was selling aluminum water bottles with an interior
> coating containing bisphenol, which is supposed to be a bad thing.
> Grant has a post on the RBW site about this, under the Rivendell News
> section. Sigg is replacing these bottle
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 4:23 PM, R Gonet wrote:
>
> Apparently Sigg was selling aluminum water bottles with an interior
> coating containing bisphenol, which is supposed to be a bad thing.
> Grant has a post on the RBW site about this, under the Rivendell News
> section. Â Sigg is replacing these bo
Grant's post was painfully altruistic, at least to my "ear." Too bad
SIGG mishandled this -- its employees and merchants deserve better,
and, of course, its customers.
For what its worth, I have a wonderful double-walled ss SIGG bottle
that I use all the time for riding with hot coffee to work a
