Answered my own question: 130mm is the plan.
On Dec 12, 11:01 am, William wrote:
> I don't recall, is the San Marcos going to have a 130mm, 132.5mm or
> 135mm back end spacing?
>
> On Dec 12, 9:30 am, eflayer wrote:
>
> > yes, both of the protos i rode had one inch threaded forks with nitto
> >
I don't recall, is the San Marcos going to have a 130mm, 132.5mm or
135mm back end spacing?
On Dec 12, 9:30 am, eflayer wrote:
> yes, both of the protos i rode had one inch threaded forks with nitto
> quills.
>
> On Dec 12, 8:39 am, RoadieRyan wrote:
>
> > Very Cool I have been hoping for an upd
yes, both of the protos i rode had one inch threaded forks with nitto
quills.
On Dec 12, 8:39 am, RoadieRyan wrote:
> Very Cool I have been hoping for an update for months -thanks for the
> post. It appears to have a 1 inch head tube with quill stem is that
> the case...?
>
> On Dec 11, 4:04 pm,
Very Cool I have been hoping for an update for months -thanks for the
post. It appears to have a 1 inch head tube with quill stem is that
the case...?
On Dec 11, 4:04 pm, eflayer wrote:
> pretty sure i rode this one first today:
>
> https://www.rivbike.com/assets/payloads/364/original_oct1visus.
pretty sure i rode this one first today:
https://www.rivbike.com/assets/payloads/364/original_oct1visus.pdf
On Dec 11, 3:58 pm, eflayer wrote:
> did not have camera as i had no idea there would be anything to shoot.
> if you are half way interested now, i believe you will be in with two
> feet w
did not have camera as i had no idea there would be anything to shoot.
if you are half way interested now, i believe you will be in with two
feet when they arrive. let me say again, it really does fit my riding
style, i am intrigued by good looking sloping framesets, especially
lugged ones; which a
