Yes, the Logo is a Vega with additional lower pannier rails.
Surprising they would make a full touring rack (Logo) with such a
narrow top. The Logo has a rating of 40kg vs. 25kg for the Vega. Can't
believe that the lower rails would allow 15kg more, as they don't
really add that much structurally,
On Nov 18, 3:13 am, Earl Grey earlg...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone else have a Tubus with ridiculously wide spacing between
the bottoms of the legs? Is this intentional or is mine a freak of
manufacture? (as opposed to nature
I had a Cargo, no spacers needed, 135mm rear spacing.
--
You
My Logo measures 165mm at the drop-out attachments, so it takes a
little squeezing to install.
No big deal, but it does require an extra hand. It's a stainless
model, if that should matter.
Earl says -
The Logo has a rating of 40kg vs. 25kg for the Vega. Can't
believe that the lower rails
The Vega looks identical to the Logo without the extra (lower) pannier
rails. I previously owned a Logo on my Fargo... Very nice, very
solidly built rack, no question. The primary difference I noticed is
that the Tubus is narrower than the Nitto. Some may prefer this; I
personally like a rack
Patrick, you have it reversed. The Vega has a 25 kg load rating and
the Fly only an 18.
I had bought the Fly originally as I really like the single front
attachment but returned it for the Vega as the width of the Fly is
very narrow.
They are both very nice racks. I got my silver ones from one
