Whelp I'm 6'3 with a 97 cm PBH and I wish I had bought a 68 Quickbeam instead
of the 64 I did get. Youthful inexperience had caused large frame phobia. . .
but yeah 66 isn't that huge!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To uns
That's possible.
On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 2:15:51 PM UTC-6, Mark Reimer wrote:
>
> Deacon, if you don't understand the benefits of increased standover, you
> either aren't doing enough jumps or aren't going nearly fast enough :)
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
Deacon, if you don't understand the benefits of increased standover, you
either aren't doing enough jumps or aren't going nearly fast enough :)
On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 10:42:54 AM UTC-5, Deacon Patrick wrote:
>
> I ride a 62cm Hunqa on all kinds of stuff and have a PBH of 90cm without
> issu
Ha! Not quite, but close. It's 66cm is sized the same as the 62 Hunqa.
With abandon,
Patrick
On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 12:33:04 PM UTC-6, Philip Williamson wrote:
>
> Deacon - you also ride a Quickbeam built for a 7 foot man!
>
> Philip
> www.biketinker.com
>
--
You received this message bec
Deacon - you also ride a Quickbeam built for a 7 foot man!
Philip
www.biketinker.com
On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 8:42:54 AM UTC-7, Deacon Patrick wrote:
>
> I ride a 62cm Hunqa on all kinds of stuff and have a PBH of 90cm without
> issue ever in the ?? years I've had it. The "need" for smaller
I ride a 62cm Hunqa on all kinds of stuff and have a PBH of 90cm without
issue ever in the ?? years I've had it. The "need" for smaller frame to
ride trails is highly exaggerated in my experience. May be worth playing
with it with that in mind?
With abandon,
Patrick
On Friday, June 12, 2015 at
