I replied to your email. Yes I am wanting it.
Kelly
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/Zj2KfB4CZMQJ.
To post to this group, send email
Hi Kelly,
Well, I'm about to do the unk-thinkable and put my 68cm Quickbeam up
for grabs. Let me know if you're interested.
Thanks,
al
On Jun 27, 10:56 pm, Kelly Sleeper tkslee...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok so I'm not holding my breath... But am looking just the same.. You know
you want to sell it.
Seconds on the next quickbeam after Kelly snatches one up. When one
finally becomes available maybe another will follow.
Ryan
6'7 230 lbs 99cm PBH
On Jun 27, 10:56 pm, Kelly Sleeper tkslee...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok so I'm not holding my breath... But am looking just the same.. You know
you want
One of you tall dudes can have the thrill of having a commuter bike that's
too big for you, for SUPER cheap! I have this 27 frame Fuji leftover from
the bike swap I helped run as a fundraiser for my kids' elementary school.
$80 + shipping! Lugs! Steel! Two chainrings like a QB! A choice
What's the top tube length on that?
Some very tall frames from that era are not so long. I have a
Centurion from about 1983 in my rafters that I remember as being a
62/56. I called it a hunchy frame.
On Jun 28, 3:00 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
One of you tall dudes can have the thrill
the Hugey Fuji probably qualifies as 'hunchy'. I think it's more like a
58cm c-t-c on the level top tube, but I'll measure.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
