On Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:36:41 AM UTC-4, Tony DeFilippo wrote:
>
> I saw a reference to 52mm tires being max for these original bombadil's...
> What are some of the larger tires you have successfully run on these frames?
I started out running Pacenti NeoMotos 2.3's on my later Bomba...
.
-Original Message-
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tony DeFilippo
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:37 AM
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [RBW] double horizontal toptube Bombadil
I saw a reference to 52mm tires
Cant speak personally, I only ever ran hetres on mine with 52mm fenders. It
was nice to finally fit fenders to a bike without it being a 3 hour
struggle with clearances, ill tell you that much.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Tony DeFilippo wrote:
> I saw a reference to 52mm tires being max fo
I saw a reference to 52mm tires being max for these original bombadil's... What
are some of the larger tires you have successfully run on these frames?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Subject: RE: [RBW] double horizontal toptube Bombadil
Hmmm, this is my old bike and a lugged nitto 27.2 worked fine. I don't think
they all needed a smaller seatpost.
On Oct 22, 2014 2:33 PM, "Allingham II, Thomas J"
mailto:thomas.alling...@skadden.com>> wrote:
I believe that’s
27.2 it is. Thank you for the input.
Cheers
Scott
On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 1:35:04 PM UTC-7, Mike Gillespie wrote:
>
> On 10/22/14, Goshen Peter > wrote:
> > Yeah, mine came like that too before the re-paint but the 27.2 was fine,
> > never had to like jam it in or anything. I bought it o
On 10/22/14, Goshen Peter wrote:
> Yeah, mine came like that too before the re-paint but the 27.2 was fine,
> never had to like jam it in or anything. I bought it off the original
> owner Michael
> Gillespie, maybe he knows for sure about this particular bike?
Right Peter. I used a 27.2 mm post
Scott,
I have a 64m Bombadil from the first batch. The original online description
said the new frame would take a 26.8 post, but mine takes a 27.2. The frame
was built by Waterford in case that makes a difference.
David Sprunger
Fargo, ND
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Nanga Parbat wrote:
> H
*On Behalf Of *Nanga Parbat
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:33 PM
>>> *To:* rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
>>> *Subject:* [RBW] double horizontal toptube Bombadil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Does anyone
ctober 22, 2014 2:33 PM
>> *To:* rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* [RBW] double horizontal toptube Bombadil
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does anyone know the seatpost size for the double horizontal top tube
>> Bombadil? 26.8?
>>
>&
unch@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Nanga Parbat
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:33 PM
> *To:* rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* [RBW] double horizontal toptube Bombadil
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone kn
I believe that’s correct.
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Nanga Parbat
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:33 PM
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: [RBW] double horizontal toptube Bombadil
Hello,
Does anyone know the
Hello,
Does anyone know the seatpost size for the double horizontal top tube
Bombadil? 26.8?
Cheers,
Scott
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to r
13 matches
Mail list logo
