On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:11 AM, kps wrote:
>
> i've been thinking i might try the new Outlier women's daily riding
> pant, but it might be tricky figuring out the sizing on that pant.
> whatever i order will probably be
> too small. ;) www.outlier.cc
Someone mentioned that they thought Title N
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Steve Palincsar wrote:
>
> As I said, they appear to be catering to stick insects.
I buy a lot of clothes at Title 9. I like their styles, I wish they
would sell clothes for bigger women, because I'm at the upper end of
their size range, but there is no way anyone
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Steve Palincsar wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:45 -0800, beth h wrote:
>> Yeah, well, I used to think so, too, until I started looking at the
>> sizing charts for womens-specific bike clothing.
>> When the largest chest size offered is a 40 and the largest hip si
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:45 -0800, beth h wrote:
> Yeah, well, I used to think so, too, until I started looking at the
> sizing charts for womens-specific bike clothing.
> When the largest chest size offered is a 40 and the largest hip size
> offered is a 32 (and they call THAT XL, btw!), it's down
Here are two reviews of some woolen sweaters:
http://epicureancyclist.blogspot.com/2009/03/womens-wednesdays-in-search-of-perfect.html
http://epicureancyclist.blogspot.com/2009/03/womens-wednesday-on-thursday-perfect.html
Funny, I think everyone commenting on this thread has already read and the
This is not just a problem for women. I am 6'1" and am just over 200lbs.
There are a couple of clothing lines whose 2xl is not large enough for me. Who
are they kidding.
I haven't been following this thread so this may have been brought up already
but my wife has had good luck with Terry
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Steve Palincsar wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 19:26 -0800, beth h wrote:
>> Title Nine has some very nice stuff, but is generally a massive bummer
>> if you're a woman of size. And according to their sizing charts, I
>> apparently qualify as a woman of size.
>
> Th
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 19:26 -0800, beth h wrote:
> Title Nine has some very nice stuff, but is generally a massive bummer
> if you're a woman of size. And according to their sizing charts, I
> apparently qualify as a woman of size.
Then they must cater primarily to stick insects. You are many thi
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 1:02 PM, David Hallerman wrote:
> +1 from my wife, too...likes and loves Ibex upperwear, for cycling and the
> rest of life, but has had problems with their shorts.
>
> Their smallest size women's shorts were too big on her, and she has strong
> cyclist butt and thighs (not
+1 from my wife, too...likes and loves Ibex upperwear, for cycling and
the rest of life, but has had problems with their shorts.
Their smallest size women's shorts were too big on her, and she has
strong cyclist butt and thighs (not skinny there). So if the smallest
size was too big, that impli
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:49 AM, cyclotourist wrote:
> FWIW, My wife likes their uppers, but now their lowers.
>
My significant other wears A LOT of clothing from the Title-9 catalogue.
Title-9 is one of the catalogues that makes me a bit envious.
http://www.titlenine.com/
Excellent clothing
FWIW, My wife likes their uppers, but now their lowers.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 5:01 AM, MichaelH wrote:
> My wife would second Anne's recommendation of Ibex products. She
> likes their shorts, arm & leg warmers for rides of more than an hour.
> Michael
>
> On Jan 2, 11:02 pm, Anne Paulson wrot
My wife and I have loved Swobo products for the past two decades. Great
products.
Girlie stuff is here: http://www.swobo.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=1044
They have removable liners for the pants/shorts, and the jerseys are just
marvelous...
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Justin August wrote:
13 matches
Mail list logo