On 4 January 2011 at 14:20, Ben Bolker wrote:
| On 11-01-04 01:35 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
[...]
| > Well, it's the version of the accelerated BLAS/Lapack code that is
| > more at fault than Lapack itself. As this occurs on Mac OS X and not
| > on other operating systems one test would be to buil
rcpp-devel readers will be coming in to the middle of a conversation
but it's all there if you want to catch up.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> On 4 January 2011 at 12:24, Ben Bolker wrote:
> | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> | Hash: SHA1
> |
> |
On 4 January 2011 at 18:58, Romain Francois wrote:
| Le 04/01/11 18:51, Rainer Hurling a écrit :
| > libexecinfo is not an internal libc function within FreeBSD. It has to
| > build as external so called port. On my system it is installed in
| > version 1.1.
| >
| > The ports info says:
| >
| > --
Le 04/01/11 19:09, Douglas Bates a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Romain Francois
wrote:
Le 04/01/11 17:42, Romain Francois a écrit :
Le 04/01/11 16:35, Andrew Redd a écrit :
Cedric,
This was addressed about 2 weeks ago on t
On 04.01.2011 18:58 (UTC+1), Romain Francois wrote:
Le 04/01/11 18:51, Rainer Hurling a écrit :
On 04.01.2011 16:58 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 4 January 2011 at 07:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 4 January 2011 at 12:02, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| | On 03.01.2011 13:20 (UTC+1), Dirk Ed
On 04.01.2011 18:58 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 4 January 2011 at 18:24, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| On 04.01.2011 14:04 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|> On 4 January 2011 at 12:02, Rainer Hurling wrote:
|> | On 03.01.2011 13:20 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|> |> Rainer,
|> |>
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Romain Francois
> wrote:
>> Le 04/01/11 17:42, Romain Francois a écrit :
>>>
>>> Le 04/01/11 16:35, Andrew Redd a écrit :
Cedric,
This was addressed about 2 weeks ago on the list, please read t
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Romain Francois
wrote:
> Le 04/01/11 17:42, Romain Francois a écrit :
>>
>> Le 04/01/11 16:35, Andrew Redd a écrit :
>>>
>>> Cedric,
>>> This was addressed about 2 weeks ago on the list, please read the
>>> archives. Basic point, Rcpp/sugar will not be faster than
On 4 January 2011 at 18:24, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| On 04.01.2011 14:04 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 4 January 2011 at 12:02, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| > | On 03.01.2011 13:20 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > |> Rainer,
| > |>
| > |> Please use the rcpp-devel list for question
Le 04/01/11 18:51, Rainer Hurling a écrit :
On 04.01.2011 16:58 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 4 January 2011 at 07:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 4 January 2011 at 12:02, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| | On 03.01.2011 13:20 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | As mentioned above build and in
On 04.01.2011 16:58 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 4 January 2011 at 07:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 4 January 2011 at 12:02, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| | On 03.01.2011 13:20 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | As mentioned above build and install are successfull. But testing if
| | ins
On 04.01.2011 14:04 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 4 January 2011 at 12:02, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| On 03.01.2011 13:20 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|> Rainer,
|>
|> Please use the rcpp-devel list for questions. You need to subscribe to post,
|> or you can use a web-to-list interfa
Le 04/01/11 17:42, Romain Francois a écrit :
Le 04/01/11 16:35, Andrew Redd a écrit :
Cedric,
This was addressed about 2 weeks ago on the list, please read the
archives. Basic point, Rcpp/sugar will not be faster than basic
functions in R. Do something more complicated to see improvements. I
wou
Le 04/01/11 16:35, Andrew Redd a écrit :
Cedric,
This was addressed about 2 weeks ago on the list, please read the
archives. Basic point, Rcpp/sugar will not be faster than basic
functions in R. Do something more complicated to see improvements. I
would suggest something that involves lots of
On 4 January 2011 at 07:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 4 January 2011 at 12:02, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| | On 03.01.2011 13:20 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | As mentioned above build and install are successfull. But testing if
| | installed package can be loaded fails:
| |
| | -
On 4 January 2011 at 15:14, Cedric Ginestet wrote:
| Happy new year to everyone,
|
| I have made a very straightforward comparison of the performance of standard
R,
| Rcpp function and sugar, and found that the latter produces the poorest
| performance. Let me know what you think and how I could
Cedric,
This was addressed about 2 weeks ago on the list, please read the archives.
Basic point, Rcpp/sugar will not be faster than basic functions in R. Do
something more complicated to see improvements. I would suggest something
that involves lots of copies and edits, that will mess with R's m
Happy new year to everyone,
I have made a very straightforward comparison of the performance of
standard R, Rcpp function and sugar, and found that the latter produces
the poorest performance. Let me know what you think and how I could
improve such performance assessment.
###
On 4 January 2011 at 12:02, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| On 03.01.2011 13:20 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Rainer,
| >
| > Please use the rcpp-devel list for questions. You need to subscribe to post,
| > or you can use a web-to-list interface to gmane.org.
|
| Done. Hope it is ok to pursue the
On 03.01.2011 13:20 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Rainer,
Please use the rcpp-devel list for questions. You need to subscribe to post,
or you can use a web-to-list interface to gmane.org.
Done. Hope it is ok to pursue the private thread on the list.
On 3 January 2011 at 11:54, Rainer Hu
20 matches
Mail list logo
