The Module function in Module.R is mysterious because it is not clear from
the code itself or from the docs that the second argument can be a DLLInfo,
yet that is what appears in your example. Also, this function is re-entered
for the same object, with different logic each time. When the module
par
I finally managed to get an example from the Rcpp documentation to fail for me.
Rcpp_module_class_error.R
Description: Binary data
Rcpp_module_class_error.Rout
Description: Binary data
___
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>> In the continuing saga ...
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Dou
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> In the continuing saga ...
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Dougl
In the continuing saga ...
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
On looking more closely at the output, I
On 6 January 2011 at 13:10, Douglas Bates wrote:
| On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Steve Moffitt wrote:
| > My mail server didn't like the attached installation script - I've resent
it with the script header removed.
| >
| > From: rcpp-devel-boun...@list
Hi Steve,
Welcome to the list.
On 6 January 2011 at 12:35, Steve Moffitt wrote:
| First, is this an appropriate way to report issues with Rcpp and RInside?
Very much so.
| Second, I'd like to commend all developers for your fine work in supporting
the R environment, especially through the
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Steve Moffitt wrote:
> My mail server didn't like the attached installation script - I've resent it
> with the script header removed.
>
> From: rcpp-devel-boun...@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
> [rcpp-devel-boun...@lists.r-f
My mail server didn't like the attached installation script - I've resent it
with the script header removed.
From: rcpp-devel-boun...@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
[rcpp-devel-boun...@lists.r-forge.r-project.org] On Behalf Of Steve Moffitt
[smoff...@whtradi
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>>> On looking more closely at the output, I thought that the problem may
>>> arise in loading the Rcpp package because that is when
First, is this an appropriate way to report issues with Rcpp and RInside?
Second, I'd like to commend all developers for your fine work in supporting the
R environment, especially through the Rcpp and RInside packages.
I've updated both versions on an up-to-date Fedora Core 13 machine and they
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>> On looking more closely at the output, I thought that the problem may
>> arise in loading the Rcpp package because that is when the function
>> init_Rcpp_cache() is evaluated. So I ran
On 6 January 2011 at 00:17, Christian Gunning wrote:
| Attached is a small diff to the RcppDE vignette. I added 2 well-cited
| primary lit papers that are helpful (and internet available)
| introductions to DE. While I was at it, I ran the doc through the
| spell-checker :).
Lovely! Thanks for
13 matches
Mail list logo
