On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> As the Grateful Dead said, "What a long, strange trip it's been." I
> have spent over a month trying to debug some code in the lme4a package
> that uses Rcpp modules. Partly I was getting the wrong numerical
> answer, which was due to a dum
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> As the Grateful Dead said, "What a long, strange trip it's been." I
> have spent over a month trying to debug some code in the lme4a package
> that uses Rcpp modules. Partly I was getting the wrong numerical
> answer, which was due to a dum
As the Grateful Dead said, "What a long, strange trip it's been." I
have spent over a month trying to debug some code in the lme4a package
that uses Rcpp modules. Partly I was getting the wrong numerical
answer, which was due to a dumb cut-and-paste error on my part - now
fixed - but more importa
Thanks again!
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> Thanks for posting here, and the kind words below.
>
> On 30 January 2011 at 15:49, Sunny Srivastava wrote:
> | Dear Rcpp-List:
> |
> | I have been working on speeding my R code. A while ago, I realized that
>
Howdy,
Thanks for posting here, and the kind words below.
On 30 January 2011 at 15:49, Sunny Srivastava wrote:
| Dear Rcpp-List:
|
| I have been working on speeding my R code. A while ago, I realized that no
| further vectorization would help and interacting R with C/C++/.. was
absolutely
| ne
Dear Rcpp-List:
I have been working on speeding my R code. A while ago, I realized that no
further vectorization would help and interacting R with C/C++/.. was
absolutely necessary. I don't program in C/C++ extensively, so the
transition was a difficult process. I tried to use the R API but the er
