To Windows Rcpp users:
I'm now back online, and looking for test cases for the new gcc 4.9.2
toolchain. I'll be posting them to a page that's currently on CRAN at
bin/windows/Rtools/scripts. R 3.2.0 will not use this toolchain, it
will use the old one. Rtools33 no longer has the new toolchain,
On 18/03/2015 11:33 AM, Martyn Plummer wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 07:55 -0700, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
> Is it not considered a "known problem" that C++ libraries linked
> against by R packages need to be rebuilt with g++ 4.9.2 in order for
> the R packages to install/load?
This could well be due
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 07:55 -0700, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
> Is it not considered a "known problem" that C++ libraries linked
> against by R packages need to be rebuilt with g++ 4.9.2 in order for
> the R packages to install/load?
This could well be due to incompatible thread models (win32 vs posix).
Duncan,
- Original Message -
> From: "Duncan Murdoch"
> To: "r-de...@r-project.org" ,
> rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 6:27:26 AM
> Subject: [Rcpp-devel] Windows gcc toolchain for R 3.2.0
>
> To anyone following the Windows toolchain saga:
>
> The gc
Duncan (and everybody else working on it behind the curtains),
Thanks for the update. All the work is truly appreciated, and it is really
too bad that we turned to C++ testing so late in the process. But ensuring
release quality is paramount, so withholding g++ 4.9.* on Windows til these
issues
To anyone following the Windows toolchain saga:
The gcc 4.9.2 toolchain that is currently in Rtools33 has too many
incompatibilities with existing code, so we won't be using it in the R
3.2.0 build. I will soon be uploading to CRAN a new version of Rtools33
that is very similar to Rtools32, c
To anyone following the Windows toolchain saga:
The gcc 4.9.2 toolchain that is currently in Rtools33 has too many
incompatibilities with existing code, so we won't be using it in the R
3.2.0 build. I will soon be uploading to CRAN a new version of Rtools33
that is very similar to Rtools32, c
On 18 March 2015 at 13:03, Marius Wirths wrote:
| enviroment. Dirk, your information, that there are indeed many packages using
| modules without any issues was an important information for me. So i think, it
| must be something wrong with my code. Maybe something is missing in my
| "Makevars"-fil
Hello Dirk, hello Martyn,
thank you both for your quick and helpfull response. Yesterday i recognized that i did not use r-patched so i invested a couple of hours to get r-patched up and running under Solaris (i'm not very familar with Unix-alike operating systems so it took me a while). Sadly,
On 18 March 2015 at 09:45, Martyn Plummer wrote:
| Well that is one interpretation. Another one is that as a testing
| platform Solaris exposes weaknesses in C++ code that are not found by
| other platforms due to its fastidious interpretation of the C++98
| standard.
Indeed. Which makes it even
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 09:42 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Hi Marius,
>
> On 17 March 2015 at 15:26, Marius Wirths wrote:
> | Hello everybody,
> |
> | this is my very first post on this mailing list so if I have made any
> mistakes
> | please feel free to point me to it.
> |
> | I have wr
11 matches
Mail list logo
