Le 20/03/2018 à 17:22, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
Akshay,
On 20 March 2018 at 15:54, akshay kulkarni wrote:
| Can I also write this:
|
| M[1:i, n:m] as we write in R?
Please consider to stop posting elementary C++ beginners question to the
list. We do not provide as a C++ tutorial or trainin
Akshay,
On 20 March 2018 at 15:54, akshay kulkarni wrote:
| Can I also write this:
|
| M[1:i, n:m] as we write in R?
Please consider to stop posting elementary C++ beginners question to the
list. We do not provide as a C++ tutorial or training service here. Please
learn at least /some/ C++ af
dear serguei,
Thanks...
Can I also write this:
M[1:i, n:m] as we write in R?
If not, are there any packages that do it for me?
what about RcppEigen?
Basically, I want to write the following R code:
{p <- 1;
for(i in 550:nrow(x)){
y[p] <-
Le 20/03/2018 à 12:10, akshay kulkarni a écrit :
dear members,
I came to know from stackoverflow that the
following references a row in a matrix in C++:
M[2] references 2nd row of the Matrix.
SO is too big to check this assertion by ourself. Do you have a link?
Dear all,
Can anyone give me advice/help on how to list the name(s) of all functions
defined within a module?
Here is an example of what I am trying to achieve:
Assuming that I have
inc <- '
using namespace Rcpp;
double SE(double alpha, double beta, double epsilon){
return alpha;
};
double EI
On 20 March 2018 at 11:42, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
| I may have my own reasons for that, but that's not the point here. The
| point is that I expected a homogeneous behaviour across Rcpp classes
| when any object is passed to operator<< (i.e., print *something*).
|
| By grepping the source, I discovere
dear members,
I came to know from stackoverflow that the
following references a row in a matrix in C++:
M[2] references 2nd row of the Matrix.
I am using Rcpp to write C++ code in R.
However, I ended up with the following inconsistency:
> M
x y z
[1,] 1 1 1
2018-03-20 4:33 GMT+01:00 Tim Keitt :
> Why not something like:
>
> Rcpp::sourceCpp(code='
> #include
>using Rcpp::Rcout;
>
>// [[Rcpp::export]]
>void print_addr(SEXP x){
> Rcout << static_cast(x) << std::endl;
> }')
>
> I'm not sure why one would expect Rcpp types t
