On 10/6/12 2:14 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> R CMD INSTALL Rcpp_0.9.14.2.tar.gz
When I ran the above on Mac OS X "Mountain Lion",
it worked, but it used g++ (from latest Xcode, 4.5.1)
instead of clang++.
I'd be happy to test with clang++ 3.1, which is the default
under Xcode now, if you tell m
On 8/27/12 4:27 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
Dirk is trying to point out that the two calls are using the same
mechanism. All that the inline package does is wrap the process of
compiling, linking and dynamically loading the C++ function.
Executing a function compiled this way is exactly the same
e an actual response inline below, but
am leaving the rest here for the list.
On 11 July 2012 at 18:07, Bob Carpenter wrote:
| On 7/11/12 3:52 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > You can /absolutely/ use int64_t with Rcpp,
| > you simply can't upload a package using it to CRAN.
|
| I can&#x
o the [rcpp] list".
How should we specify the type of size_t in
Windows 64 bit given that we can't say "size_t" or "unsigned
long long"? The only other option seems to be "unsigned __int64".
Here's the full table of types from the horse's mouth:
On 7/10/12 9:30 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 10 July 2012 at 21:01, Jiqiang Guo wrote:
| Dear List:
|
| I case across an error on Windows 7 64bits, any idea how can I avoid that?
| I wish I could provide a demonstrative example, but it's too complicated now.
|
| This is the error report:
This list is really helpful! Comments inline below.
There aren't any questions -- just more of an explanation
of what we're trying to do.
On 5/9/12 6:19 PM, Steve Lianoglou wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jiqiang Guo wrote:
As Dirk previously points out, every element of Rcpp::List
Thanks again, Dirk, for being so responsive to
our newbie queries. There's some more inline below.
On 5/8/12 11:34 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 8 May 2012 at 23:17, Jiqiang Guo wrote:
> | Suppose I have a function in CPP as
> |
> | void cppfun(Rcpp::List lst) {
> | ..
> | }
> |
>
On 5/7/12 1:05 AM, Michael Hannon wrote:
Steve Lianoglou wrote:
I spent 1997--2011 developing C and Java (not C++)
on Unix/Windows/Linux and moved to Mac OS X and C++ a year
and a half ago.
> I *am* curious to know what is so nice about Mac OS X.
1. It's a form of Unix, making the shell mo
*** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug
sh: line 1: 2493 Abort trap
'/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/bin/R' --arch=x86_64
--no-save --slave <
/var/folders/ju/juD0VflHENew03RUV+bbPU+++TM/-Tmp-//RtmpEs9sCx/file971c5161ca
ERROR: loading failed for ‘x86_64’
* re
