k for Rcpp-based functions. Another option is using
>> >clusterEvalQ (as mentioned in the shared post); however, I am not sure
>> >if
>> >CRAN likes to see the library(package name) inside the codebase. What
>> >are
>> >your thoughts?
>> >
>>
Hi Naeem,
My (very quick) guess is that this isn't an Rcpp problem per se, but a
parLapply problem. You need to explicitly load your package on each
worker so that functions from it are available.
See, e.g., the brief discussion here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18357788/parallel-parlappl
I don't have time right now, but the offending line is here:
https://github.com/jesusfv/Comparison-Programming-Languages-Economics/blob/master/RBC_Rcpp.R#L62
which calls `sourceCpp` repeatedly on each loop iteration.
Should be a one line change to move it outside the loop and un-sully the
good n
t;- as.numeric(x)
> }
>
> do.call(internal_function_name, list(x))
> }
>
> add2(1:5)
> ```
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Michael Weylandt
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any (easy) way to get Rcpp::stop() to behave li
Hi,
Is there any (easy) way to get Rcpp::stop() to behave like
base::stop(..., call.=FALSE)? That is, to just print the error message
(possibly preceded by "Error: ") without the name of the calling
function.
Right now, the error message produced by an Rcpp::stop call returns
info about the calle
> On Apr 24, 2015, at 23:58, Christian Gunning wrote:
>
> Quick question, mainly out of curiousity. I get that Rcpp uses the R api on
> the backend, and in the R api, R::rpois returns a double (and Rcpp::rpois
> returns NumericVector). The R C code doesn't offer much in the way of
> explanat
There's an active R-GSOC bunch and I'm sure a good Rcpp project would get
support that way. Dirk has sponsored GSOC projects in the past so I bet you
wouldn't have too much trouble finding a mentor. ;-)
http://rwiki.sciviews.org/doku.php?id=developers:projects:gsoc2013
And a mailing list off goo
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 29 March 2012 at 18:51, Patrick Burns wrote:
> | On 29/03/2012 18:33, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | >
> | > On 29 March 2012 at 19:12, Romain Francois wrote:
> | > | Le 28/03/12 13:56, Ulrich Bodenhofer a écrit :
> | > |> Hi,
> | > |
