@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 December 2011 18:24
To: Watson, Samuel
Cc: rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at
Subject: Re: [Rcpp-devel] CppBugs vs WinBugs
Oh, that's great. I thought you said the linear model was only showing 2x in
your first email.
Glad you are finding it useful. Eventually, one sh
fference for me for winbugs vs
cppbugs is 40s vs 10s which is a big difference.
I will test some more models and hopefully this model is just an anomaly for me.
Thanks for a great package!
Sam
-----Original Message-
From: Whit Armstrong [mailto:armstrong.w...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 December 201
recommendations of things that could be slowing the
model down?
I am running Windows 7 Enterprise on Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.4 GHz w/ 8GB DDR3
RAM
Many thanks,
Sam Watson
-Original Message-
From: Whit Armstrong [mailto:armstrong.w...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 December 2011 15:23
To: Watson,
me(radon.test<-bugs(radon.data,radon.inits,radon.param,model.file="radon.bug",n.chains=1,n.iter=2,working.directory=getwd(),bugs.directory="D:/R/WinBUGS14",n.thin=5))
---
The difference I get is 16.53s
I am currently using CppBugs with Rcpp through R. I am very interested
to use CppBugs as I am finding WinBugs to be prohibitively slow, I use
large amounts of data in large multilevel models, so when I found
cppbugs I was excited. It says on the Github page for cppbugs that I can
achieve speeds of
