Re: [Rcpp-devel] [RCPP Sugar] sapply function

2013-05-30 Thread Romain Francois
Le 10/05/13 17:40, Julien Duvanel a écrit : Hello again, I hope I don't disturb you too much. I have again a small question. I haven't seen the answer on your vignette, maybe this is not possible. Here's what I would like to do : /double Foo(double x, double a1, double a2) {/ /return f(x,a1,a2)

Re: [Rcpp-devel] [RCPP Sugar] sapply function

2013-05-10 Thread Julien Duvanel
Hello, Thanks for you quick answer (again!). After some research, I found the functions : Mapply_2, and Mapply_3. I'll have a look how it works. I haven't understood the second proposition but if the first one works it's fine. Have a nice evening, J. Le vendredi, 10 mai 2013 à 17:47, Roma

Re: [Rcpp-devel] [RCPP Sugar] sapply function

2013-05-10 Thread Romain Francois
Iirc we have mapply2 and mapply3. Otherwise you can make Foo a helper class instead of a function. And you embed the 3 variables in your class. Le 10 mai 2013 à 17:40, Julien Duvanel a écrit : > Hello again, > > I hope I don't disturb you too much. I have again a small question. I haven't

[Rcpp-devel] [RCPP Sugar] sapply function

2013-05-10 Thread Julien Duvanel
Hello again, I hope I don't disturb you too much. I have again a small question. I haven't seen the answer on your vignette, maybe this is not possible. Here's what I would like to do : double Foo(double x, double a1, double a2) { return f(x,a1,a2); } NumericVector myVec; sapply(myVec, Foo(