>> I guess we could come up with a nicer syntax for these, maybe static
>> functions in Vector<> so that we could do :
>>
>> IntegerVector::is_na( )
>> NumericVector::get_na( )
>> ...
>
>
> commmited in rev 3979.
I don't want to flog a dead horse, but one of the things I like about
github is how e
Le 16/11/12 14:00, Hadley Wickham a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Romain Francois
wrote:
Thanks for exploring these issue. This looks very useful.
I get:
str( first_log(NA) )
logi TRUE
str( first_int(NA_integer_) )
int NA
str( first_num(NA_real_) )
num NA
str( first_ch
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Romain Francois
wrote:
> Thanks for exploring these issue. This looks very useful.
>
> I get:
>
>> str( first_log(NA) )
> logi TRUE
>> str( first_int(NA_integer_) )
> int NA
>> str( first_num(NA_real_) )
> num NA
>> str( first_char(NA_character_) )
> chr "NA"
>
Thanks for exploring these issue. This looks very useful.
I get:
> str( first_log(NA) )
logi TRUE
> str( first_int(NA_integer_) )
int NA
> str( first_num(NA_real_) )
num NA
> str( first_char(NA_character_) )
chr "NA"
For first_log: a bool can either be true or false. In R logical vectors
Hi all,
I'm working on a description of how missing values work in Rcpp
(expanding on FAQ 3.4). I'd really appreciate any comments,
corrections or suggestions on the text below.
Thanks!
Hadley
# Missing values
If you're working with missing values, you need to know two things:
* what happen
