On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Romain Francois wrote:
> I'm not sure which version of the vignette you are referring to, but the
> one on CRAN (related to Rcpp 0.8.9) recommends to have this in the
> NAMESPACE:
>
> import(Rcpp)
>
> This might be conservative and you might end up importing too muc
I'm not sure which version of the vignette you are referring to, but the
one on CRAN (related to Rcpp 0.8.9) recommends to have this in the
NAMESPACE:
import(Rcpp)
This might be conservative and you might end up importing too much. I
don't see much of a downside to it.
Le 08/12/10 21:21, Do
To be more concrete, I define a module in foo.cpp and do something like
this:
foo = Module("MyClass", PACKAGE="MyPack")
foo$myfunc()
Where myfunc() is defined using function() in the RCPP_MODULE macro. I
can also extract the underlying reference and work with that as well.
This works without the
I have a question about the modules vignette.
At the end it says client packages must importClassesFrom(...),
and there are comments about using .onLoad() as well.
But before reading this I already implemented the use of
modules in another (client) package without using these
constructions. They
