On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Romain Francois
wrote:
> Not that I care, but I'm slightly surprised at the implementation of log1p
> :
> specifically that it throws an exception
> Romain
I changed the code in msvcmath.cpp to return non-signalling NaN when there
is
a problem instead of throwing
Le 24 août 2010 à 17:58, Dominick Samperi a écrit :
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Romain Francois
> wrote:
> Not that I care, but I'm slightly surprised at the implementation of log1p :
> specifically that it throws an exception
> Romain
>
> I changed the code in msvcmath.cpp to re
There appears to be a problem with the svn server (R-Forge).
When I try to update (or checkout) I get:
svn: Can't find a temporary directory: Internal error
>From what I could find on the Internet this is a server problem.
Perhaps they are doing maintenance of some kind...
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010
Dominick,
I've commited a variation of your patch in Rcpp now. Let me know if that
works for you.
I've put the new headers in inst/include/Rcpp/msvc instead of
inst/include/msvc to lower chances of clashes with other software.
I've also modified msvcmath.cpp so that when this is not used in
Le 20/08/10 17:38, Dominick Samperi a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Romain Francois
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I have not seen any of these files. But note that, as Dirk said
before, please send patches rather than full copy of modified files.
>From some di
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Romain Francois
wrote:
> I have not seen any of these files. But note that, as Dirk said before,
> please send patches rather than full copy of modified files.
>
> From some directory of your modified Rcpp tree, just do :
>
> $ svn diff > mypatch.diff
>
> and send
Le 19/08/10 17:24, Dominick Samperi a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Dominick Samperi mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Just like any other open source project, we prefer _patches_
(and see [1] if
you are unclear as to what these are -- they are not _modified
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
> Just like any other open source project, we prefer _patches_ (and see [1]
>> if
>> you are unclear as to what these are -- they are not _modified copies_)
>> rather than copies. If you want us to consider your work, the onus is on
>> you
On August 19, 2010 07:12:00 am Dominick Samperi wrote:
> It appears that the post got through in spite of the "rejection"?
It didn't: nobody on the list saw it, only the 'bounce' address (list
admin).
> These changes consist of just a few small changes to existing
> code (all ifdef-ed _MSC_VER s
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> This list runs with standard defaults of Mailman, a popular choice for
> running mailing list, as set up by R-Forge.
>
> In particular, message limits are 40kb. Larger messages are held and then
> create admin work. Yesterday, an attem
This list runs with standard defaults of Mailman, a popular choice for
running mailing list, as set up by R-Forge.
In particular, message limits are 40kb. Larger messages are held and then
create admin work. Yesterday, an attempt to send a 90kb message got rejected,
and I as list owner got the bo
11 matches
Mail list logo
