cppModules (Christoph Bergmeir)
2. Re: R.e. loadRcppModules (Romain Francois)
3. Re: R.e. loadRcppModules (baptiste auguie)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 18:29:20 +0200
From: Christoph Bergmeir
Subject: Re: [Rcpp-devel]
On 26 May 2011 10:30, Romain Francois wrote:
>
> I think R-ints has the answers to the questions I'm not asking myself yet.
This ought to be a fortune()!
baptiste
___
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.
Hi,
This is something I/we need to concentrate on, so that we find the right
way to deal with it.
I'm not sure at the moment how much work this will be.
I think R-ints has the answers to the questions I'm not asking myself yet.
Romain
Le 25/05/11 18:29, Christoph Bergmeir a écrit :
Hi list
Hi list,
I remembered that this discussion was going on here about 6 weeks back, and now
I have nearly the same problem. Maybe somebody has made any progress:
Luckily, I have for some of my C++ objects a serialization function ready. So
I'd like to make them survive the save/restart/load cycle
On 14 April 2011 at 07:49, Douglas Bates wrote:
| On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Christian Gunning wrote:
| > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Romain Francois
| > wrote:
| >>>
| >>> Just to clarify -- does your plan include storing user-modified
| >>> fields and properties in objects? E.g.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Christian Gunning wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Romain Francois
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just to clarify -- does your plan include storing user-modified
>>> fields and properties in objects? E.g. below, modtest with the msg
>>> set?
>>
>> yes. Although the
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Romain Francois
wrote:
>>
>> Just to clarify -- does your plan include storing user-modified
>> fields and properties in objects? E.g. below, modtest with the msg
>> set?
>
> yes. Although the way I see it, this will require more work for the
> developper, who w
Le 13/04/11 07:29, Christian Gunning a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
The documented behavior is that an external pointer is replaced by a
null pointer when an object is serialized.
Thanks. Got it.
I was planning to
experiment with an object that has enough
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>
> The documented behavior is that an external pointer is replaced by a
> null pointer when an object is serialized.
Thanks. Got it.
> I was planning to
> experiment with an object that has enough information saved as R
> objects to be able
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Romain Francois
wrote:
> Le 12/04/11 04:15, Christian Gunning a écrit :
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:00 AM,
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> This will load the declared modules, and populate them into your
>>> package's namespace.
>>>
>>> I will update the Rcpp-modules v
Le 12/04/11 04:15, Christian Gunning a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:00 AM,
wrote:
This will load the declared modules, and populate them into your
package's namespace.
I will update the Rcpp-modules vignette accordingly.
Suggestions, comments, improvements, "what are you ? nuts !", .
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:00 AM,
wrote:
>
>
> This will load the declared modules, and populate them into your
> package's namespace.
>
> I will update the Rcpp-modules vignette accordingly.
>
> Suggestions, comments, improvements, "what are you ? nuts !", ... are
> always welcome.
Works great f
12 matches
Mail list logo
