Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp and required steps before next release

2014-01-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 29 January 2014 at 12:06, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: | Yes, thanks. I took a look at https://github.com/kevinushey/RcppBiocChecks and it looks like Bioconductor packages are in good shape. Thanks Kevin for checking this, and Steffen for fixing mzR and Rdisop. | | That document does refer to sever

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp and required steps before next release

2014-01-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 28 January 2014 at 22:10, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: | Thanks. I was actually wondering something slightly different: for the ones that need modification, will they still work with the current Rcpp after being modified, or are the changes not backwards-compatible? I will investigate and I guess I

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp and required steps before next release

2014-01-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
- | > Subject: Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp and required steps before next | > release | > Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 19:18:40 -0500 | > From: Kasper Daniel Hansen | > To: Dirk Eddelbuettel | > CC: Steffen Neumann , | > "rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-projec

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp and required steps before next release

2014-01-28 Thread Kasper Daniel Hansen
Dirk, others, For large-scale testing like this up against Bioc, you could also try to get in contact with the Bioconductor build managers. The responsibility changes over time, but I believe that right now it is Dan Tenenbaum, danda...@dandante.com, cc'ed. Best, Kasper On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp and required steps before next release

2014-01-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 28 January 2014 at 17:24, Steffen Neumann wrote: | It passes R CMD check with R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25) | and Rcpp_0.10.6.1 I didn't address that earlier: 0.10.6.1 is from r-forge, and is behind. The real development version is 0.10.6.9 and is on GitHub at https://github.com/Rc

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp and required steps before next release

2014-01-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Steffen, Thanks so much for the prompt response. Replying to both posts here. On 28 January 2014 at 17:08, Steffen Neumann wrote: | Hi Kevin and Dirk, | | thanks for your preparations to make the transition smooth. | | On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 19:35 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | [...] |

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp and required steps before next release

2014-01-28 Thread Romain François
Just don’t assume you can #include anything else than Rcpp.h and RcppCommon.h (but this one only if you need to provide custom wrap and as). Romain Le 28 janv. 2014 à 17:24, Steffen Neumann a écrit : > Hi, > > I just pushed mzR-1.9.4 to BioC-SVN, which only required a change > of #include's

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp and required steps before next release

2014-01-28 Thread Steffen Neumann
Hi, I just pushed mzR-1.9.4 to BioC-SVN, which only required a change of #include's in src/pwiz/utility/misc/sha1calc.cpp "[...] because it tries to include Rcpp/iostream/Rostream.h, which no longer exists (consolidated into Rcpp/iostream/Rstreambuf.h) [...]" => Since when does Rstreambuf.h

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp and required steps before next release

2014-01-28 Thread Steffen Neumann
Hi Kevin and Dirk, thanks for your preparations to make the transition smooth. On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 19:35 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: [...] > linking step, and src/Makevars will go away for most packages. [ Exceptions: I pushed Rdisop 1.23.2 to BioC-SVN, removing Rcpp from Depends, as it

[Rcpp-devel] Rcpp and required steps before next release

2014-01-27 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
All, A new Rcpp release is ready. But we need to take a few step to get to it. With considerable help from Kevin Ushey, I have spent the last two weeks testing this release against all known [but 5] CRAN dependents (and Kevin did the same for BioConductor), identifying and correcting a few last