Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp modules take 3, now with a vignette

2010-05-27 Thread Davor Cubranic
That's pretty cool. It's good to know it should be doable -- I'll give it a whack, once (if) I graduate to that level of expertise with template meta-programming and R internals. Davor On 2010-05-27, at 12:36 PM, Romain Francois wrote: > Davor, > > Rcpp modules currently does not handle enum

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp modules take 3, now with a vignette

2010-05-27 Thread Romain Francois
Davor, Rcpp modules currently does not handle enum types, but Boost.Python does, so I suppose we could have similar syntax. http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_43_0/libs/python/doc/v2/enum.html This is not high on my priority list, but if you want to prepare some patch, I'll look into it. Roma

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp modules take 3, now with a vignette

2010-05-27 Thread Davor Cubranic
Hi Romain, Can you tell me if this mechanism can somehow be used for passing enum-type arguments from R to Rcpp? I'm currently using strings or integers, and hope there can be an easier way to keep the two sides of the code from getting out of sync. Davor On 2010-05-27, at 2:35 AM, Romain Fr

[Rcpp-devel] Rcpp modules take 3, now with a vignette

2010-05-27 Thread Romain Francois
Hello, I've made a quick (5 pages) vignette about the current feature set of Rcpp modules. I've pushed the current version here: http://addictedtor.free.fr/misc/rcpp/Rcpp-modules.pdf The vignette is essentially a compilation of my last two emails about modules. Romain. BTW: The c++ code is