On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:06:06 +0100,Romain Francois
wrote:
> the .col method gives you a subview_col :
>arma_inline subview_col col(const uword col_num);
>arma_inline const subview_col col(const uword col_num) const;
> not an umat.
> The name of the class implies that it is a "
Le 10/12/12 17:06, Romain Francois a écrit :
the .col method gives you a subview_col :
arma_inline subview_col col(const uword col_num);
arma_inline const subview_col col(const uword col_num) const;
not an umat.
The name of the class implies that it is a "view" class, so a way to
l
the .col method gives you a subview_col :
arma_inline subview_col col(const uword col_num);
arma_inline const subview_col col(const uword col_num) const;
not an umat.
The name of the class implies that it is a "view" class, so a way to
look a data from another class. hence, no data o
Dear All,
I am trying to pass columns from an Armadillo matrix to a function, but
I'd like to pass just a reference to the column, not a copy of the column
and I do not seem to be able to do it "elegantly".
The code below (function f1) I think shows that passing X.col to a
function creates a co
