On 31.05.2011 21:44 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 31 May 2011 at 09:27, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| Dirk, sorry again for my misunderstanding.
No worries. I do appreciate how you (pretty much single-handedly) try to keep
R and its packages viable on your chosen platform.
That's nice circum
On 31 May 2011 at 09:27, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| Dirk, sorry again for my misunderstanding.
No worries. I do appreciate how you (pretty much single-handedly) try to keep
R and its packages viable on your chosen platform.
| Yes, I also think that
| FreeBSD people could live with this patch.
The
Am 30.05.2011 18:21 (UTC+1) schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
On 30 May 2011 at 17:21, Rainer Hurling wrote:
|> I do not understand what you are asking: "as meant in RcppArmadilloConfig" ?
|> Neither Romain, Doug nor I use a *BSD variant (if we ignore OS X as a
BSD-derivative).
|> So nothing in Rcp
On 30 May 2011 at 17:21, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| > I do not understand what you are asking: "as meant in RcppArmadilloConfig" ?
| > Neither Romain, Doug nor I use a *BSD variant (if we ignore OS X as a
BSD-derivative).
| > So nothing in RcppArmadillo explicitly enables or disables *BSD.
|
| Than
On 30.05.2011 16:24 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 30 May 2011 at 15:43, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| I tried RcppArmadillo_0.2.21.tar.gz with R-devel from today on FreeBSD
| 9.0-CURRENT (amd64). The build fails with the following messages:
|
| --
| #R CM
On 30 May 2011 at 15:43, Rainer Hurling wrote:
| I tried RcppArmadillo_0.2.21.tar.gz with R-devel from today on FreeBSD
| 9.0-CURRENT (amd64). The build fails with the following messages:
|
| --
| #R CMD INSTALL RcppArmadillo_0.2.21.tar.gz
| * installing t
I tried RcppArmadillo_0.2.21.tar.gz with R-devel from today on FreeBSD
9.0-CURRENT (amd64). The build fails with the following messages:
--
#R CMD INSTALL RcppArmadillo_0.2.21.tar.gz
* installing to library '/usr/local/lib/R/library'
* installing *source*
