On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:06 PM, JJ Allaire wrote:
> Hi Chistian,
>
> With sourceCpp, you can actually specify an exported function name
> explicitly in the export declaration. For example:
>
> // [[Rcpp::export("fun.class")]]
Great, thanks. I hadn't tried that. I did search the Rcpp-attributes
Hi Chistian,
With sourceCpp, you can actually specify an exported function name
explicitly in the export declaration. For example:
// [[Rcpp::export("fun.class")]]
So this will work for sourceCpp but alas isn't currently possible for
cppFunction. One way around this for cppFunction would be to p
I just realized that cppFunction can't natively build S3 functions, since
fun.class isn't valid C++ function name. I'm wondering if adding and
S3class argument (default value = FALSE, otherwise class name as
character) to cppFunction makes sense -- all that's needed is
appending the class name
