On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>
>
> As for the use of Rcpp, the STL containers and algorithms can be
> exploited to an even greater extent. If you are willing to jump
> through the hoops of defining a struct that inherits from
> std::binary_function then you can shorten t
On 19 June 2011 at 13:20, Douglas Bates wrote:
| Interesting post, Christian. It turns out that the apply family can
| get better performance than the explicit loop but, as you have seen,
| no using aaply. The choices in this case are sapply or, slightly
| faster, vapply from the base package.
Interesting post, Christian. It turns out that the apply family can
get better performance than the explicit loop but, as you have seen,
no using aaply. The choices in this case are sapply or, slightly
faster, vapply from the base package. I also tried using cmpfun from
the compiler package but
Dear all,
I haven't been able to keep up with the list this month (I'm looking
forward to catching up on the Module developments), but I just posted
this, which might be of interest to some.
http://helmingstay.blogspot.com/2011/06/efficient-loops-in-r-complexity-versus.html
If anyone has a few s