>To be fair, it's 300k by 300k (not 3mill by 3mill), so:
>
>R> (30 * 30 * 8) / 2^30
>[1] 670.5523
>
>So, I guess 0.67 terabytes ... no problemo ;-)
>
>-steve
I'm getting the picture now. Thanks for the additional example. And
Doug, sorry I still missed your earlier point.
__
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:44 AM, French, Joshua
> wrote:
>> Thank you all for the responses.
>>
>> Christian, I didn't know about the copy_aux_mem option. I will have to
>> take a look at that.
>>
>> Dirk, thanks for looking into the 64-b
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:44 AM, French, Joshua
wrote:
> Thank you all for the responses.
>
> Christian, I didn't know about the copy_aux_mem option. I will have to
> take a look at that.
>
> Dirk, thanks for looking into the 64-bit matrix indices.
>
> Doug, the place in my code where I get the
Thank you all for the responses.
Christian, I didn't know about the copy_aux_mem option. I will have to
take a look at that.
Dirk, thanks for looking into the 64-bit matrix indices.
Doug, the place in my code where I get the error is when I multiply
matrices. I might have matrices X and Y, whe
