Issue should be fixed. mzR release and devel versions have been bumped
to trigger a rebuild (thanks Dan, from Bioc). I will check that the
new binaries work as expected.
Thank you all for your input.
Laurent
On 29 June 2012 16:31, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 29 June 2012 at 15:01, Neumann,
On 29 June 2012 at 15:01, Neumann, Steffen wrote:
| Hi,
|
| the mzR almost always worked on BioC build machines.
| It was the users who had reported failures on their systems out there.
|
| So there is not really sth. we need to do on the BioC side,
| but to prevent users from messing up somehow
el [e...@debian.org]
Sent: 29 June 2012 15:52
To: Neumann, Steffen
Cc: Laurent Gatto; Davor Cubranic; rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at
Subject: Re: [Rcpp-devel] mzR and Rcpp - could not find function
"errorOccured"
On 29 June 2012 at 13:43, Neumann, Steffen wrote:
| Hi,
|
| what is the
] on behalf of Laurent Gatto
[lg...@cam.ac.uk]
| Sent: 27 June 2012 10:09
| To: Davor Cubranic
| Cc: rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at
| Subject: Re: [Rcpp-devel] mzR and Rcpp - could not find function
"errorOccured"
|
| On 26 June 2012 21:42, Davor Cubranic wrote:
| > Does
-project.org] on behalf of Laurent Gatto
[lg...@cam.ac.uk]
Sent: 27 June 2012 10:09
To: Davor Cubranic
Cc: rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at
Subject: Re: [Rcpp-devel] mzR and Rcpp - could not find function
"errorOccured"
On 26 June 2012 21:42, Davor Cubranic wrote:
> Does
On 26 June 2012 21:42, Davor Cubranic wrote:
> Doesn't Rcpp 2.11 require 2.15.1, and the computers on which you had problems
> had 2.15?
>
> Also, you don't say if you tried rebuilding your package, or if you just
> continued using the same binary. It is possible that since Rcpp API changed,
>
On 26 June 2012 at 15:55, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 26 June 2012 at 13:42, Davor Cubranic wrote:
| | Doesn't Rcpp 2.11 require 2.15.1, and the computers on which you had
problems had 2.15?
| |
| | Also, you don't say if you tried rebuilding your package, or if you just
continued using th
On 26 June 2012 at 13:42, Davor Cubranic wrote:
| Doesn't Rcpp 2.11 require 2.15.1, and the computers on which you had problems
had 2.15?
|
| Also, you don't say if you tried rebuilding your package, or if you just
continued using the same binary. It is possible that since Rcpp API changed,
th
Doesn't Rcpp 2.11 require 2.15.1, and the computers on which you had problems
had 2.15?
Also, you don't say if you tried rebuilding your package, or if you just
continued using the same binary. It is possible that since Rcpp API changed,
the missing symbol is detected by the dynamic link loader
On 26 June 2012 20:17, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Laurent,
>
> On 26 June 2012 at 19:39, Laurent Gatto wrote:
> | Dear all,
[...]
> I am confused. So in general no error on Linux and on some versions of
> Windows and OS X, but an error on other versions of OS X and Windows?
>
> Could this be
Laurent,
On 26 June 2012 at 19:39, Laurent Gatto wrote:
| Dear all,
|
| The mzR package [0] depends on Rcpp and the following issue has
| appeared under some configurations:
|
| > library(mzR)
| Loading required package: Rcpp
| Error : .onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for 'mzR', details:
| ca
Dear all,
The mzR package [0] depends on Rcpp and the following issue has
appeared under some configurations:
> library(mzR)
Loading required package: Rcpp
Error : .onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for 'mzR', details:
call: value[[3L]](cond)
error: failed to load module Ramp from package mzR
co
12 matches
Mail list logo
